gapbetweenus @ gapbetweenus @feddit.de

Posts

2

Comments

664

Joined

2 yr. ago

It still has to be economically viable. Even if someone made one with good intentions, there’d still have to be a way to keep it afloat. How would you go about doing that?

There is a wide range between maximizing for profit and making a project viable.

I actually think that a good and popular dating app would theoretically solve that as the dating pool would be much larger.

On one hand, on the other people get more picky with more choice. Dating is not a technological but a societal issue.

Somebody really passionate about it has to make one and not sell it or make it publicly tradable? Which would be difficult since the market is rather full (I would guess). Also dating can be just a miserable experience if one lacks self esteem and does not fit into societal expectations of desirability - that's not on dating app problem.

I’m not saying that people are immoral for liking some plaid.

Fetishizing school uniforms worn by children gives some serious Steven Tyler vibes. fetish that seems less “natural”

Sure sounds like you are. And you sound also rather judgy about it. Maybe it's just a language thing - but at least that's my impression.

Who ever started the whole enlightenment thing, with the idea that there is no god and we are responsible for our self.

The problem, like with a lot of stuff, ist that they are for profit and optimized in a way to maximize profit over the actual functionality.

Or SEO is focused on gaming google.

Sexuality is tightly connected to societal taboos, as long as everyone involved is a consenting adult - it's no-one else businesses. There is no need or benefit in moralizing peoples sexuality.

if we’ll have to retreat into a whitelist federation model with invite-only instances

That does not sound bad.

Nah, nobody can wreck my life better than me.

Big tech is teaching us about morality.

Why would it be any different?

Because pedophiles display pathological deviation when it comes to sexual attraction.

For porn in general, yes - I think the data is rather clear. But for cp or related substitute content it's not that definitive (to my knowledge), be it just for the reason that it's really difficult to collect data on that sensitive topic.

The question is if consuming AI cp is helping to regulate the pedophiles behavior or if it's enabling a progression of the condition. As far as I know that is an unanswered question.

Assembly line work sound more soul crushing.

They forgot the /s, their customers won't get the joke.

Because that's where people are?

Dang, thanks I finally got how Christians are often so judgemental - you guys are thinking that you're stating facts not passing judgement. That conversation was rather useful after all.

That message did not arrived at general population.

Sure if you chose to take the words literally - but that's kind of the point of the whole conversation.

And you do make yourself an arbiter - the moment you say that someone is not a true Christian.

So why are you an arbiter of morality despite all what you say?

Plot twist, it was the only ball sowjets have - that's why sowjets were so good at hockey.