gapbetweenus @ gapbetweenus @feddit.de

Posts

2

Comments

664

Joined

2 yr. ago

It's not?

But what if a meme just happens to be a SQL injection?

I don't really understand what is unethical about AI photo edit to begin with? Like photo editing before AI existed and you could make anything you want with a ps.

Since we have mail and text messages, robo alli g shlould be outlawed by Geneva Convention.

Cool idea, I think you need to start some discussion yourself first so it's not that empty.

If you wearing something with a brand name or logo visible, you are were fooled into being an ad without even being payed.

Make it a habit to always just stand up when you wake up. Even if it's like an hour away from when you actually wanted to get out of bed. I used to be really bad at getting out of bed, but now even when I'm depressed I manage quite well. I will say you need motivation to get around the start.

AI is just a specific subset of algorithms, also not that new - first concept are from 1960 or so (from memory don't quote me) with perceptron. New is parallel computing power of modern chips - that allows for far better performance.

Ads is basically free money for broadcasters. And since greed is the main motivation - the dissension seems to be rather easy for them.

You understand that someone has to pay for that entertainment shit you use to kill your time with? You are literally shitting on people who are paying for you.

Stop supporting greedy bastards that are trying to push hard psychological manipulation down you throat, only for you to buy so shit no-one needs.

I see, it's seems that I misunderstood you. Now that I get your point, I would rather agree.

I think a lot of man have unfortunately difficulties to empathize with women here, because they have rather different experience when it comes to expressing their sexuality and possible negative consequences.

You might not, but others do. People have rather different thresholds when it comes to what they consider intimate. I recommend to just listen to interviews with victims and it becomes clear that to them the whole thins is very intimate and disturbing.

Even without being puritan, there are just different levels of intimacy we are willing to share with different social circles - which might be different for everyone. It's fundamental to our happiness (in my opinion) to be able to decide for ourselves what we share with whom.

Everyone’s opinion about the law matters,

Hard disagree, only opinion of people who actually read the law - matter on the topic. Everything else just creates more confusion. We are on the internet most people never bother to go and actually read what they are talking about - and that includes me.

If they understand that this kind of porn exists? No.

You know people form opinions on actors based on their roles in movies? So people will change what they think of you and how they act towards you based on media, even if it's clearly fictional.

The downside is giving law enforcement yet another excuse to violate digital privacy. Laws that are difficult/impossible to enforce tend to do more harm than good.

How exactly? Which new abilities to violate digital privacy is given the state by the this bill?

They look just as fake as the oil paintings.

You can go photo or even hyper realism with oil. And with AI you just need a bit of post.

One thing is for sure, lawyers will make bank.

We need better education.