gandalf_der_12te @ gandalf_der_12te @feddit.de

Let me fall

---

Read more

Posts

12

Comments

448

Joined

2 yr. ago

The Fuck operation, also known as dual pairing.

That's true.

It's also true in other fields. For example, take far-eastern fighting skills:

Young students will try to hit someone, to beat someone up, to hit a target, to become "stronger".

Experienced teachers, however, don't really care about hitting a target. It's all about the posture. How you stand. How you carry out your movements.

Well, it's something like the difference between { x: null } and { }.

I just don't agree that it "doesn't help".

It does help, at least it helped me.

Not asking these questions doesn't get us any closer to the answer either though?

the magic is that you exist at all, darling, and that you can observe it

I'm imagining the way to go would be to evaporate the liquid in the first tank, then pump the gas from one tank to the other one, like you would pump any other gas, and then liquifying that gas to liquid again.

Isn't there, like, artificial gravity from rotation? I.e. centrifugal forces?

Edgy comment here but:

In another thread we were discussing AI-generated CSAM. Thread:

https://feddit.de/post/6315841

You would probably agree, then, that such material is not problematic, because even if it looks like CSAM, and it quacks like CSAM, it is not CSAM, therefore we don't have to take it seriously or regulate it in similar ways that we do regulate actual CSAM, if I continue your logic, no?

I believe that at a certain point, "agency" is an emergent feature. That means that, while all the single bits are well understood probability-wise, the total picture is still more than that.

It makes sense to me to accept that if it looks like a duck, and it quacks like a duck, then it is a duck, for a lot (but not all) of important purposes.

I disagree. This is no meaningful talking point. It doesn't help anyone in practice. Sure, it clears legal questions of responsibility (and I'm not even sure about that one in the future), but apart from that, making an artificial distinction between a human and a looks-and-acts-like-human, provides no real-world value.

stock data

just like you boil rice

Yes, happens a lot. I would be very surprised if the brain had no nerve endings at all, given that almost all human tissue has nerve endings in it (except hair maybe).

I guess what you feel is a complicated mixture of:

• blood and fluid pressure
• electric discharges in your brain, kinda tingling
• placebo

Meanwhile in China:

https://www.carbonbrief.org/analysis-chinas-emissions-set-to-fall-in-2024-after-record-growth-in-clean-energy/

Probably even if the data is incomplete or fragmented, humans can still draw value from it.

Bullshit.

It should instead read:

"Humans were stupid and taught a ChatBot how to cheat and lie."

there's an exception to the rule

turn boy -> catgirl

i wanna see you do that