The issue is that we need more housing. Government housing is already cheaper than market and the issue(rather expectedly) is wait times. Put money into more housing, not cheaper housing.
Propaganda and strategic narratives is literally my profession. Take everything I say with a grain of salt. Just because I believe it does not mean I'm not being strategic. Educate yourselves. Learn how journalism works. Learn its limitations. Experience the world and try not to take it too seriously.
It's not fake but also not relevant. Good news provides context in addition to simple event facts. The best propaganda is based in truth. The intent here is to promote the idea that the West is rotten and corrupt through and through.
They only get these facts because of a transparent society so antiwestern propagandists have always had an easier time supporting that narrative.
Our takeaway should be that they system is working and ensuring that political interest groups are kept in check and transparent within society. Less liberal societies would simply jail them and hide the evidence.
Politics is not binary (everything not my opinion is Nazi). Your claims here don't actually say anything other than you refuse to actually look up the history and philosophies of liberalism and left movements.
Well, at least you have focused in on the thing that almost no one will agree with you on and is demonstrably false through hundreds of years of research.
The fact that minority communities split off to form societies with left policies in no way supports the idea that they treated minorities within their own group better. Giving more economic power to the majority (even in a true democratic socialist system) simply means that they hold more power over the minorities. It is absolutely what has happened in every example that's scaled and I can point to multiple genocides to support it.
It is why most intellectual left academics focus on anarchism which has it's own issues in terms of rights protections, productivity, and central coordination in a system without a market.
Just like fascism needs a unified society including corporatocracy to succeed, so too does left ideals need resource control. The flaw is baked into the system at it's core and nothing eliminates people's natural tendencies to be exclusionary. Every society deals with it. Fascism deals with it by eliminating it. Left societies deal with it through resource control. Liberal societies enable base protections of property that show clear indications and recourse when rights are violated.
There are clearer takeaways and examples if we focus on one ideology within these groupings ie Nazism vs Francoism, classic Leninism vs modern anarchist thought, or classical liberalism vs neoliberalism.
Ultimately, if a country like the United States of America were to magically change to a classic communism model overnight with no bloodshed, you didn't make it less racist. You just handed the majority more power over the minority. If your worldview includes that education would make the difference, it could and should under any model. 90% of the time when true left leaning folks say they want change in the system, it's because they want to force through their ideals, not that there's anything built into their proposed system to actually keep it that way.
This is largely why the American left shifted to a reform mindset in the '60s. Not only were they not getting the results they wanted with their approach, they were watching the atrocities happening in the East combined with the civil rights movement and decided that maybe they shouldn't be fighting to give more power to the majority without some kind of economic check on power. It's why you started seeing institutional changes combined with legal protections, education, and social shifts instead of radical changes. There is no radical change that can fix things, it takes a wholistic approach.
Smaller communities with little in the way of minorities are hardly great examples. Arguably, their inability to get along with other ethnic groups and subsequent splits in their creation supports the opposite idea.
Are you willing to admit that it's enough of an argument for the right to ban it using the same powers you are proposing here? That's why it's problematic and they've used this playbook before.
If this is the definition, I would like to submit the song We are Young by Fun. The music video definitely supports the idea.