fxdave @ fxdave @lemmy.ml

Posts

6

Comments

106

Joined

2 yr. ago

you can turn off notifications from starred projects

I'm not against it, but another factor that we should check in a terminal emulator (as a tool where you run everything from) is the system requirements.

I'm using urxvt and that's so easy on the system, it starts instantly. I can open multiple instances without worrying about the system resources.

I believe it uses X.org's text rendering. X.org uses OpenGL under the hood. It's not CPU rendered.

Alacrity felt bulkier when I tried. I will try this too though.

Of course they extended it with minimal state. But how I understand it, they are very similar.

In contrast, modern liberalism is more like how EU works with its big tech regulations. This is in contrast with the classical free market ideology. Market is not fully free under modern liberalism, because everyone sees its injustice.

Also modern liberalism is interested in social justice like LGBTQ, while the classical is not.

Am I incorrect?

I mean, this is how I see it: Modern liberalism was too different from classical liberalism, so libertarianism had to have a different name for their classical liberal believes.

Whatever I read, libertarianism is originated from classical liberalism.

How about this one?

Modern liberals have held that freedom can also be threatened by private economic actors, such as businesses, that exploit workers or dominate governments, and they advocate state action

source: https://www.britannica.com/question/How-does-classical-liberalism-differ-from-modern-liberalism

(You are right about private property, I meant personal property)

I think what you linked is its old meaning. Now liberal is more likely about e.g. LGBTQ rights, than private property. At least, private property exists in socialism too. I can imagine a liberal socialism, where the economy is socialist, but it gives you freedom in speech, etc..

I guess I'm from a different circle with this meaning.

Who are “we”, and how is this related to “topics”?

I think, a fully liberal person who is liberal in every topic, doesn't exist. Like killing people could also be a right. So "we" is the majority of the people.

what's the problem with mastodon?

liberal's meaning is basically giving people rights

Hopefully, but it's easier to tell each company what they should do instead of giving them rules that they try to workaround. There are many examples.

aah my favorite template engine, I have seen it so long ago

From the list, openscad requires the least tutorial. Solvespace is really easy also, but you need to watch some exciting modelling videos before you get the idea around it. Blender is hard.

OpenScad also gives you a different modelling experience that lets you write reusable models, e.g. if you are a carpenter, 90% of your modelling is sizing and positioning fiberboards to shape a box. You can "automate" such tasks, easily. I wrote a script for myself that does that, and I'm now super fast at modelling furnitures. After some modelling you will be also capable of making such lib. (As a developer, I might be biased)

If you are interested in this library: https://github.com/fxdave/woodworkers-lib

Try solvespace or openscad or blender depending on your use-case.

afaik, fedora is the testing distro for RHEL. I also felt this way, when a new gnome version released much earlier than for Arch and it had an obvious bug that could be catched with little testing.

And many issues I found in Fedora's bug tracker was auto closed by the new release. Which is quite frequent. Reviewing the bugs is not that frequent.

That's also why I always use dev containers

You may see shorts in lemmy in the near future because of that.

Slack calls disabled for firefox users, but if you change the user agent to chrome it works...

well, yes, but for e.g. I wrote a software piece that happened to be only a hotkey daemon. And I could write it with X. Now, hotkey daemons are no longer a separate thing unless the compositor exposes a grab API. Which never going to be in Wayland protocol, because they consider this client server architecture a problem.

There's hope. Thanks for letting me know.

Now instead of having Wayland covering everything, applications try to cover every desktops. In the good old times, it worked everywhere.

Why does flameshot need to handle different wayland desktops separately? Because simply the protocol doesn't do it's job. It doesn't cover everything. It's indeed not ready.