Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)FH
Fushuan [he/him] @ fushuan @lemm.ee
Posts
2
Comments
1,238
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • I currently use tidal and I'm thinking of switching. The most important feature of an audio streaming service for me is, audio radio. Meaning, I have a base playlist and I want it to auto generate it with more similar songs so it doesn't stop. New discoveries are important too.

    Does it offer this recommendation feature? The last time I briefly checked it I didn't find information about that. I'd like some confirmation before I begin merging my 1k+ liked songs...

  • Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • That most of her thirsty viewers are christians probably.

    What I first got is a critique of people that do something and say the reverse. It looks ridiculous when you see a stripepr do it but when those so called bible lovers promote hateful laws somehow it doesn't look heretical for them??? That's the critique for me.

  • Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • "Im so tired of hearing that getting set up is easier in bluesky, you can do it like this on mastodon"

    "That didn't set up my account, which includes getting a healthy following base"

    ...

    "That's not the discussion we are having"

    I'm another person but, are you sure it isn't? Setting up the account is not only creation, it's all the tweaks until it's useful for the user. If the user needs connections and searching for them is harder (due to how search works currently with federation) then setting up is indeed harder on Mastodon, which is the point the one you are responding to is reinforcing.

  • A minute long test sounds awfully short for something that will cost millions if it fails.

    Testing in real life when failure is so expensive is less than ideal, any controlled closed environment is better if it means you avoid failure. The very next paragraph from the one I quoted mentions how another rocket spent weeks in testing this specific matter and was delayed because they found the issue.

    I'm paraphrasing what i read some NASA dude said about spaceX, but basically, if they failed as much as spaceX did they would be out of their jobs yesterday. Also, you know who takes the cost of these failures right? It's the US government through all the expensive spaceX contracts and tax breaks they sign. Each blown rocket makes the contract renewal more expensive.

  • Not necessarily, I usually downvote comments where there are enough rebuttal replies but I still disagree heavily with what's being said. I am able to provide the Nth coherent rebuttal but I'm just either lazy or I don't want to contribute to the spam.

  • But also, fuel leaks are really common with rockets, and we know how to prevent them from happening. The fuels rockets use can escape through the tiniest of faults, and the complex fuel systems they use have numerous potential points of failure. As such, it is standard practice to find these potential leaks with intensive pre-flight checks to identify and solve these issues before they escalate into a catastrophe.

    It's pretty standard practice apparently, it IS embarrassing.