Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)FP
fuck_u_spez_in_particular @ fuck_u_spez_in_particular @lemmy.world
Posts
1
Comments
247
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • More effective would probably to buy yourself (or a person that has political potential/influence with the right intentions) into politics like president muskrat, and do well placed populistic propaganda against the actually evil fossil industry. You don't even have to lie, just do some good rethoric speech, ads etc.. We need policies on a larger level, and I think 10B$ should be enough to gain significant political influence for something that the major mass of people is already behind of, just needs a good spark. I think Thunberg has shown that. Not that we shouldn't of course improve public transport in cities. Additionally do (employ) investigative journalism probably in the same process to give all of this a good foundation..

  • You'll need 100 Musks

    To reach a catastrophic level on all kinds of scales - including climate change...

    If you mean the net-worth, you might be right, that amount of money might even have a measurable effect on human-made climate change.

  • Yeah we shouldn't underestimate the appeal of power, it's less quantifiable, but in it's essence similar to net worth (at a certain wealth).

    Yet if we wouldn't have this inequality because of capitalism, the political power might well be more focused on the good for the people (and less to the wealthy)

  • It's just a guess, but it's probably protection against other species than mammals (psilocybin I mean)...

    Regarding capsaicin, it's protecting against (almost) everything that is isn't a bird, birds don't feel the capsaicin AFAIK.

  • performance

    Like raw runtime performance, if I write the code in python, it's ~ 100x slower than in Rust. You often get away with dumber stuff in Rust as the compiler is able to optimize it well. With python you would have to write your native bindings either in Rust/C or C++. So why not straight use Rust (as the other choices aren't sa(f/n)e at this point anymore).

    Afaik you can just go to definition in literally any language, typing or no.

    No you can't, at least not in the same way that a static type-system allows. As dynamically-typed programs are evaluated on runtime, so you often don't know at the time while coding what is run. In untyped/dynamically typed languages you often use heuristics to jump into stuff, which is just less precise.

    There's more to this, but I think you get what I mean, when you programmed more intensively with static generics in Rust (compared to something similar in say javascript or python without types), IDE experience is just more precise and correct (and more fun).