frog 🐸 @ frog @beehaw.org

Posts

1

Comments

681

Joined

2 yr. ago

Yep, I'm assuming that's what Americans get weirded out by. Which is just weird because it's definitely a minority of toilets anyway. The vast majority of toilets in cafes, restaurants, bars, and large shops (or indeed any business where it's normal to be there for more than 10-15 minutes) are either publically accessible and free to use, or can be accessed with permission. It's generally frowned upon to walk into a business, use the toilet, and not buy something though, and even cafes and restaurants will only let you use the toilets if you buy at least one drink, so it could be that Americans are running into that.

There's also a thing that only some businesses have toilets positioned in a place where customers can access them - obviously if it's a tiny shop and the only toilet they have can only be reached by going through the stock room, they're not going to let people just wander in and out (and may also be barred by their insurance policy from letting non-staff into the back rooms.) They might bend that rule for someone they know, but not for someone they don't - in my home town, I know several businesses that would let me use their toilets in a pinch, but they wouldn't let a complete stranger do so (they trust me not to nick stuff, or know where to find me if I do!) So there's definitely a bunch of social conventions about when and where you can use a business's toilets, which I can easily see Americans tripping over. As I understand it, the approach to customer service is quite different in the US compared to here.

I expect that customers will not blame the business for that. They'll just think you're an inconsiderate person, like all the other parents who think a table where people eat is an appropriate place for their child's faeces...

I'm in the UK, and where I live, it's almost exclusively local council owned toilets that charge a fee. So these aren't toilets inside private businesses, they're separate buildings located in car parks, at beaches, and so on. So the fee to use them is almost certainly a combination of preventing homeless people from squatting in them (since they're not watched over by staff) and to cover the costs of electricity, water, and sending someone over to clean them once in a while (since the majority of people using them are not residents of the area who have paid council tax). The fee is nominal, £0.20, and most of them now have card readers so people don't need to have a 20p coin on them.

That's really interesting! It's definitely one of those differences between America and Europe that isn't really noticed. For me, seeing a digital clock would definitely get the "oooh, that's fancy" response. Like there are places that have a clock in the corner of a digital display for something else (eg, the displays at the train station listing the next train have a clock in the corner too), but when it's just there purely to tell the time, it's almost always an analogue one. I can't even remember the last time I saw a digital one!

I wonder if it's an America vs Europe thing? I'm in the UK and analogue clocks are still very common here as well. So maybe it's just America that don't use them much anymore.

I'm fed up already. Neighbours felt the need to party, with music and screaming, until about 4am. 2024 looks to be significantly more financially challenging than 2023 as my primary source of income has had the final nail in its coffin. I'm not looking forward to going back to university next week - I like the course as a whole, I just despise one of my fellow students and the thought of having to endure his obnoxiousness for another two and a half years is just...

I'm starting this year from a place of having almost completely given up, and it's all downhill from here.

I searched for "frog" and got some... interesting results, some more relevant than others. Not any that I'd look to for information about frogs, but I guess the site full of someone's drawings of frogs was nice. Very 90s.

It's a shame, because it would do wonders for the environment if people just cut down on both: beef once a week instead of several times a day, and 1-2 kids instead of 3 or more. Both would be more special for being enjoyed in smaller quantities, too.

Unfortunately, convincing people to have fewer children is likely to be significantly more challenging than convincing them to eat less beef.

What matters isn't whether any of this has been done before, and more authentically, and well enough to be built upon—what matters is that this particular rich man-child hasn't done it yet, from scratch, for himself and for his own dream of being The Most Special Boy.

The whole piece was a good read, but this quote stands out to me, because it literally summarises every single thing Elon Musk is involved with.

You might enjoy Larry Niven's "Known Space" series? It's less one long story than many, many stories (some more interconnected than others) set in the same universe, but there's a lot of it. Some stories are darker than others, but overall the tone is optimistic and the characters have their flaws but don't suffer from the "stumbling from one flawed decision to the next one" problem.

I suspect some of the stories won't have aged well, given some of them were written over 50 years ago, but Niven plays with a lot of interesting ideas, and I have never encountered a sci-fi author that writes genuinely alien aliens the way he does. There's also lots of exploring space, futuristic cities, and alien landscapes.

I'm inclined to agree. I was definitely an internet addict when I was a teenager, but now as a 40 year old, I'm persistently depressed by how many people my age simply cannot use more than the absolute basics of their phone and computer. Like sure, they can send a text and write in a Word document, but become completely paralysed by anything more complicated than that because they're so terrified they'll break something if they click on the wrong button. Those of us that are used to technology have no fear of pressing buttons to find out what they do.

I feel like there ought to be a sensible middle ground somewhere, where kids can be taught how to use the tools they'll be relying on as adults, without exposing them to all the downsides of the internet and exploitative apps.

He would if Alexa tried to kill him, though. That's the real problem. The downsides of technology never impact the lives of the ultra wealthy, so they don't care about the downsides.

The article says Apple violated the patents of Masimo Corp and Cercacor Laboratories. Just 30 seconds of Googling reveals both are companies that make non-invasive health monitoring devices, so it does seem legit that they own legitimate patents that they don't want to sell to Apple.

I have three games on the go at the moment. Gotta enjoy those few weeks off from university, when I actually have some time.

Empyrion: playing this with my partner. This really feels like a game that could be amazing if the devs gave it a bit of polish, cleaned up the bugs, and updated the in-game information with the current game mechanics. There's something deeply frustrating about not knowing how to do something, and every post on Steam community and Reddit has a different answer, and very few of those answers are correct in the current version of the game. It's a shame, because I'm really loving the actual gameplay. I spent most of today rebuilding my ship: suffice to say, the NPC faction that blasted holes in the previous version of the ship are going to rue the day they blasted holes in my ship. I have shields and a lot more guns. 😈

Earthlock: still enjoying this. Delightful RPG in the style of 90s Final Fantasy games. The storyline isn't wowing me. It's fine, very standard fantasy, but it doesn't stand out as anything really amazing. But it's a nice, easy-playing game with a lot of nice elements. It's cute, the gameplay mechanics are interesting, and the puzzles are just the right balance between too easy and too hard. And I can plant trees that, for some reason, spawn frogs around them. I have no idea why, but I'm not complaining. 🐸

Maneater: I really had no idea how much I needed this game in my life until I started playing it. It's been a rough couple of months, and something about being a shark on a quest for vengeance is incredibly cathartic. Those people in that fancy yacht totally had it coming. My glee definitely did escalate once I moved into an area with lots of rich people. More golf courses should have electric sharks sliding through them, chomping on the golfers. 🦈

Yep! Reddit is still pretty awful in many respects (and I only even bother with it for specific communities for which I haven't found a suitable active equivalent on Lemmy - more frogs and bugs on Lemmy please), but it did get notably less unpleasant when the majority of the truly terrible subs were banned. So it does make a difference.

I feel like "don't let perfect be the enemy of good" is apt when it comes to reactionaries and fascists. Completely eliminating hateful ideologies would be perfect, but limiting their reach is still good, and saying "removing their content doesn't make the problem go away" makes it sound like any effort to limit the harm they do is rendered meaningless because the outcome is merely good rather than perfect.

Uh, that's not what I said at all. I never once said Linux is trash. Pretty sure one of my posts said it's cool, actuakly. It just wasn't suitable for me. When it was put to me that the options are Linux or throw the computer away due to Windows 10 being end of life, then in that instance (which is not reality), then my computer might as well go in the bin precisely because Linux's inability to run a stable environment with my use case would, in effect, render my computer into a brick anyway.

Fans of Linux seem to think it's suitable for every use case, for every user, and this is simply not the case. The overlap of people that have no specialised needs for their computer (for which gaming, frankly, is one) and also have the knowledge to run Linux without any problems (since they won't be able to fix it when - not if - they get some kind of error) and the knowledge to know which hardware is compatible and which isn't (since the wrong component also renders Linux unstable) is actually very small.

It is true that removing and demonetising Nazi content wouldn't make the problem of Nazis go away. It would just be moved to dark corners of the internet where the majority of people would never find it, and its presence on dodgy-looking websites combined with its absence on major platforms would contribute to a general sense that being a Nazi isn't something that's accepted in wider society. Even without entirely making the problem go away, the problem is substantially reduced when it isn't normalised.

No problem! I hope you enjoy it as much as I have! :)

The sequel is being released sometime next year, too. It may be the one game where I break my usual rule of not buying a new game at launch.

I know someone who only just switched from XP to 10. They literally did it yesterday, after battling with 10 for a couple of months - eventually they relented and replaced the components that were simply too old to work with 10. They only upgraded they reached a point where too much of the software they relied upon ceased being compatible with XP. Technically their 15 year old graphics card is now unnecessary landfill, since it was working and my friend didn't want to stop using it - but I'm not sure I'd say a graphics card that has been in continuous use for so long could really be considered "wasted" even if it was still functional at the time of disposal.

Seems to me that the problem of working computers (and individual components) going to waste while still being usable, due to changes in software requiring changes in OS is not new. The only way to prevent it would be to ban all further development of both hardware and software, so that hardware never becomes out of date.