azuth @ freeman @sh.itjust.works

Posts

1

Comments

319

Joined

2 yr. ago

Does this include stuff like me waiving any claims against you for any action taken in a investigation by you or law enforcement?

In fact care to explain what sort of actions and investigation lemmy.world envisions performing on users?

yes your instance of your user is subject to our TOS.

I can't make sense of that sentence, I assume you mean users regardless of instance are subject to your TOS if they post in communities in lemmy.world

Which I find bizarre because I am not your user, I have not agreed to your TOS and I am not using your site, API etc deffined

To be clear I am not talking about bans or post deletions, you don't need a TOS or my consent to prevent me posting in your server.

Rather about stuff section 4.2 and the Our Rights sections where users waive you from any claims, the pseudo-legal stuff. By the same logic a user would be subject to any TOS from any instance to whose communities they happen to post at.Obviously Lemmy can't work that way.

They most certainly have this covered in ToS. IP law is not about actual creators' rights.

Not sure since I don't use a VPN. If they assigned a unique public IP per user they could just forward every incoming connection to the user's PC.

If they don't they need to setup some port forwarding rules.

If openVPN leaks IPs that's surely a bug, if it's specific to v6 you can't use openVPN and IPv6 till the bug is fixed

Port forwarding is necessary due to NAT not firewalls.

It's not that your router blocks new incoming connections at port X, it's that it does not know which local client it's meant for, since it's addressed to the public IP that is held by your router.

With IP6 it's lan client also gets assigned a public IP6 address (as there are plenty) and so the router receives a connection addressed to a Lan client and knows where to route it.

Not saying that’s not a great idea, but just think of what it would entail - for starters, who would be the commander in chief of a European army?

Not a foreign adversary, probably France

The EU needs to remove all us military from it's territory, replicate any NATO structures as EU ones and even make sure there are no people in our armies with confused loyalties. This needed to happen before Trump even became a candidate for 2016.

Its an action game with RPG like stst systems.

Even if all the ice melts (when there are going to be real problems) Russia doesn't have anywhere near the capacity to launch an amphibious attack against Canada.

Taking into account how their invasion of Ukraine, with massive land borders, was botched, there is no chance they ll succeed.

So non RPGs are better RPGs? You don't have to like RPGs.

The talking points might be, that supremacist US attitude is not. It's been there for decades.

Its not the Russians or Trump there is big part of the US that is hostile to anybody but their, imagined, version of America and places no real value on others even allies.

I am not struggling with anything, you are just not making any sense.

By your arguments Canada should neither put tariffs on the US nor really promote a boycott since in both cases, Canadians lose out. So why did you suggest Canada should respond with a boycott?

But if Canadians actually boycott a US product it doesn't matter whether the price is increased or not since they will not be buying it anyways. It only makes a difference for the Canadians that will not boycott US goods.

Respectively passing up on a cheaper/better US good due to boycott will hurt the boycotter.

The only difference is if individual Canadians get a choice or not.

Are you talking about prices in the USA? I am asking why you prefer a boycott by Canadians instead of Canadian sanctions which would raise the prices in Canada. But if you are for a boycott the price as set by tariffs is irrelevant if it's not bought anyways.

Because those developers are not actually trying to get it to work in Linux, they are trying to get it to work in Windows.

Game developers that are licensing denuvo probably are trying to get their game with denuvo.

Linux intended software does not have the performance issues denuvo has.

Is your issue with tariffs vs voluntary boycott the removal of choice from the individual?

Politically an effort to be strong-armed must be answered in terms that the aggressor will perceive as strong. A call for a voluntary boycott will not cut it. It will also not be as effective at reducing reliance on US which Canada probably actually needs.

Well I doubt the mainstream actually tweaks 3D settings in nVidia control panel. Anti cheat making some online games not work is a bigger issue but still not worth it.

The silver lining in Trump's 2nd term is that it's possible the EU leaderships will be forced to cut reliance to the US.

Hopefully they will make those changes before US switches to a pro US government and no action is taken again.

That's nvidia's proprietary software, only nvidia can add stuff to it.

As for anti-cheat, kernel level anti cheat is not going to happen on Linux, nor should it (or continue being used in Windows)

There is a moon mission and a starship variant is supposed to get people on and off the moon in 2027. Probably wants that cancelled and changed to a manned Mars mission with new, further away deadlines. Such a mission would be probably be cancelled anyways due to the much higher difficulty allowing him to save face by blaming regulators etc and promising SpaceX will colonize Mars "in the next 5 years"™.