azuth @ freeman @sh.itjust.works

Posts

1

Comments

320

Joined

2 yr. ago

Maybe it affects BSD and MacOS.

It also can affect some Linux systems based on configuration. Android doesn't implement the exploited standard at all and is always immune.

Bought Red hat and is trying to lock down it's users.

Indeed it's so weird the practically only alternative to Windows comes up when discussing Windows issues.

Perhaps BSD or ReactOS should be mentioned more. Or people told to buy a whole new Mac and throw their computer away.

Op changed it to fatal mistake from the original fatal strike..

Fixing a bug for a fee will create a liability and obligations for the developer. Should you mess it up, Microsoft will have no issue burying you to save even just face.

I can see him getting into a long term relationship that could guarantee the projects survival long-term,(and you at least invest some money for a lawyer to tell you what your are signing on for). For something that would get a few months for the project not so much.

It's χιόνι which means snow in Greece and we are not very cold.

They absolutely are and Christians were much worse towards women before social progress forced them to change their official positions or become irrelevant.

It is now apparent that they never really changed their ideas.

What exactly is a fish story? US military being in comic and anime cons?

US soldiers trying to recruit young people posing with a character from NGE blissfully unaware of the irony involved?

If right wingers can like Rage against the Machine and be surprised they are not right wing or apolitical, NGE is way too subtle for them.

They actually are not whether you use a prompt to generate the picture or a digitally paint it with a tablet.

The user would be the one committing copyright infringement.

If it’s contributing creatively to your work, yeah, totally.

AI is not contributing creatively though, programs do not create.

If you ask Photoshop fill to add an italian plumber and you’ve been living under a rock for you life so you don’t realize it’s Mario, when you get sued by Nintendo for copyright infringement it’d be much better policy if it was Adobe on the hook for adding copyrighted material and not the end user.

I am speaking of Photoshop used as a non-AI tool as it has been used to commit copyright infringement for decades before Photoshop fill was a thing. Should it check if your image infringes on copyright?

A better analogy is: if you hired a graphic designer and they gave you copyrighted material, who is liable?

The graphic designer. If you went ahead and redistributed it you would also be liable. Whatever program he used or it's developer wouldn't be liable.

Should Photoshop check your image for copyright infringement? Should Adobe be liable for copyright infringing or offensive images users of it's program create?

If you ignore the fact that the generated images are not accurate, maybe.

They are very similar so they are infringing but nobody would use this method for compression over an image codec

And they like to mess with American megacorps too.

Messing with megacrops is a feature, especially foreign ones.

Regulations are not "maybe"s.

You don't and that's a feature for Apple.

Nope he is just a rich spoiled manchild on cocaine.

What incident? Israel is not going to pull any shenanigans on France.

De facto truth is that French air force conducted air drops of supplies in uncontestedly Israeli airspace above Gaza.

Israel is not going to attack French military aircraft, it will be political suicide.

I also do not understand your fixation on commercial overflight which is irrelevant here.