frazw @ frazw @lemmy.world

Posts

2

Comments

185

Joined

2 yr. ago

According to a post I found on that shitty alien site, An AAA game has to sell 10 million copies to break even around 6 months ago. That means at $70 dollars each. They can cost $700 million to make, market and distribute. The money has to typically be recouped within a certain time frame to keep the lights on and invest in the next 700 mil project. The successful games also have to carry the weight of the failures too, so you probably aren't getting that bad a deal.

I'm not saying the price isn't inflated, just that it can cost a lot more than you might think to make this stuff, and it's all on a gamble that it will sell.

I remember buying mortal kombat ii on the megadrive/genesis with saved up pocket money for £45 ($58). That was in 1994, I think I maxed out at about 10 games. I'm seeing assassins creed shadows on the xbox at £56.99 ($74) today (ignoring online digital shops because they didn't exist in 1994.) So in 31 years inflation on the price of a premium video game has been 0.75% annually vs 2.5% for all goods and that has resulted in a small 20% increase in the price over 30 years.

Closest link I could find to back up the inflation rate. If games increased in price Inline with inflation, they'd cost about £96 ($123) today.

Games have always been expensive, but less so now than 30 years ago.

P.s. If I don't ignore online digital shops, I can actually get it cheaper the that 1994 price. Only £40 ($51). I mean come on its not like suddenly we have a bad deal on video games. Also if it really bothers you stop buying games at launch. I rarely spend more than a third of those prices now just by waiting a year or two.

Firstly, does he really think it's going so great over there that wealthy people think it's worth $5M to get in? More likely they will just wait for the fire sale and buy up the land cheap.

Second if you have 5 mil, do you need to go there for work?

All you need to do to not need the chlorine wash is to not treat the animals so badly that they shit all over each other due to lack of space. Improve their welfare improve the product, but no. Dollars come first.

You know how sometimes your get so frustrated at someone you struggle to eloquently articulate your dislike of them because there are so many facets to that dislike. This is how Elon makes me feel these days. I struggle to put it in the simplest terms.

It really bothers me that he thinks he deserves pity while denying it to others. It bothers me that his attitude towards money comes from never having had to worry about it. It bothers me that he thinks that he can take actions that threaten people's livelihoods and even their lives and expects to be loved for it. It bothers me that the only way he can rationalise why people hate him is that they have brainwashed or paid by the left rather than having legitimate grievances with him. It bothers me that he thinks if you aren't a billionaire it's because your are lazy/don't deserve to be and that their hard work is not equal to his. Lastly it bothers me that I don't know if he genuinely holds these positions or if he just uses them as justification to do horrible things.

I'm not trying to be a nay-sayer, but what does this actually achieve?

He's not disrupting a vote. He's only talking. While I'm all for the Democrats doing something this doesn't actually achieve much. Chick Schumer had a chance to actually disrupt this administration but he didn't.

So I am genuinely asking, if the Democrats are not preventing the Trump administration from pushing bills through e.g if this were a fillibuster,, how does this help?

In MAGAland everyone except George Soros agrees with trump and musk and the only possible reason that people don't, is bribery

I'm neither American nor Canadian , but I just wanted to offer up that the worry I think comes with age. When I was 9 the Berlin wall came down. Before that, there was a constant spectre of nuclear war hanging over the world thanks to the cold war. Our parents lived through those times presumably worrying while I as a child was blissfully unaware of what the cold war really meant. When I was 11 the gulf war started. Again I knew about it, but I didn't really understand what terrorism was or what was happening in Iraq. Then in 2003 gulf War 2. I was a little more tuned in to politics by now, so I was a little more concerned about it but it was still something happening far away. By the time Russians invaded Ukraine in 2022 I had a daughter. This time although it was a far away war, I was glued to updates, scared for the future of my daughter (and myself). I wonder if back when the cold war was going on if our parents were similarly worrying and freaking out when we weren't looking.

I dont want to downplay the threat, but people have had the exact same thoughts and feelings we are having before and on those occasions it worked out, ok. Not for everyone of course but for the western world. That gives me faith that even though there are bad people doing bad things, humanity on the whole is good. Maybe there are peaks and troughs along the way, and maybe we are going through a trough right now, but I am hopeful that a self correction is coming that will start us climbing back up to a peak.

I mean, she has a hugely important job. Leaking details of an attack plan is as bad as it gets but if she can't remember details like this a mere two weeks later, she isn't for for the job either.

How can she make operational decisions if her memory only goes back less than two weeks???

In the normal world everyone on that chat would be fired but we are in Trump world now so everyone just shrugs.

Nixon would never have stepped down if watergate happened in today's world.

The implication is the he and other "real men" I.e hate spewing bigots, have a strong "immune system" but the rest of us are weak.

It's another way they seek to feel superior to us peasants.

I meant any incoming administration in 4 years would have to win big in all 3 houses to demonstrate to the world that this 4 years was unwelcome and unexpected. Incidentally that's also what would be needed to effect the change BUT. A sizable proportion of the US electorate has shown an appetite for what is happening and historically the republicans always seem to do better than they should despite all the horrible shit they do. So I don't have faith that the next election would go as we hope.

In 2024, despite, or maybe because of his first term, Trump won the popular vote, and project 2025 was also not a secret.

So the question would be, what reform or reforms would convince the rest of the world the USA wouldn't pull the same moves again?

Donor caps? Media regulation?

The problem is not just getting trump out in 2028, it's keeping his followers out in 2032, 2036, 2040 etc.

With respect, it will take the US a lot longer than 4 years to rebuild the trust that has been destroyed. Even a return to the norms of the last 75 years, while it would be welcomed by the traditional allies, would mean nothing if it can be reversed so easily again in 8 years and sharing secrets and cooperation with an "ally" like that is dangerous.

Foreign policy changed radically in a matter of weeks. The US is no longer predictable or reliable.

Is this the beginning of a 2028 campaign?

He's not holding any cards right now. Trump made him a tough guy. He's gambling with World War 3.

Wait, sounds.... Nah forget it.

I'm not a professional coder but I have coded and when I do it takes me more than an hour to get into the groove, maybe because I'm shit at it, but I need to get my head into the code before I can add/improve it. This would make it impossible for me to do anything useful as I'd never get to my groove.

Apparently it only counts if you hurt people physically. Hurting their finances, support systems, healthcare, employment prospects are all fine.

Just gonna leave this here...

"Here is your big mac meal"

"but I ordered a McChicken sandwich"

"don't worry, our AI suggested swapping your order because it predicted you actually prefer chicken based on your order history which it got from facial recognition when you walked in so we started preparing it before you ordered which also meant we'd get your order out 9.4 second faster! Isn't it so clever, eh?"

"what about my drink, I didn't order diet coke?"

"we gave you diet because our AI indicated that you probably have diabetes based on body weight analysis and McDonald's is committed to healthy eating as well as maximising profits"

"I want to talk to the manager."

"the manager was replaced by AI last month, corporate felt on site managers were one of the biggest expenditures for the branches and felt AI can offer more value. I'm sure the AI will be able to help you at that terminal over there. If not, we can escalate to the corporate AI which is authorised to offer 1% off coupons and has a slight antisemitism problem..."

"the terminal over there? The one with the queue 30 minutes long?"

"yep, that's the one. Have a great day!! Oh it looks like our conversation took longer than the time we saved. Oh well, isn't AI though"

I hope that should have said "...so far". Did he survive 101 days?

That's ok, he can use full self driving at full speed on the highway...

The country that is the world champion in school shootings doesn't have much credibility when pointing the finger at others.

Rather than introducing sensible gun laws, they'd rather try to paint someone else as the villain.

While what you are suggesting is useful information no one outside the US needs to know it. We already know they are throwing stones from their glass house. Anyone inside America won't believe it.