Just once in their life, I wish Nintendo would be cool and understand that this isn't hurting them. There is no overlap between the sort of people who would buy games for the switch and the sort of people who emulate their games.
Strategy games made by paradox interactive typically have political development pop-ups that will tell you about major events and relationship changes between nations.
The news headline from the picture sounds like something straight out of those games.
The institution will usually have information about how their supplementary exams work. It will usually be on their curriculum guidelines page of their website.
It's my understanding that's the word rape, even if only alleged is a legal term that can implicate you for defamation up until the person is convicted of the charges.
Hence why media outlets do not use it until an individual is convicted.
I just don't think, regardless of financial situation, Intel would want to sell even a portion of their business. right now. Everything they've communicated to their shareholders and the public at large signals that despite a recent downturn, they really believe they have a strategy for long-term market dominance.
Not to mention the entire national security angle of intel being the only American chip manufacturer.
This is very fair, but then again, my parents would get confused over the difference between an Xbox and a PlayStation, so take that for what you will.
I believe RCPS3 uses a translation layer in order to achieve its accuracy, so I think porting it would be relatively easy. Then again, the last words of any programer are that something should be relatively easy.
Higher end mobile processors could but it is a big jump in computational load, not just because of the increased processing power of the PS3, but also because it is quite architecturally different from traditional x86 CPUs.
This is why it's kind of amazing how efficient RPCS3 is.
It might be a ripoff, but my question to you is should that be illegal? The entirety of humanity is monkey see monkey do iteration on our previous ideas. It's a dubious thing to litigate.
To add to that, no fan of either is going to confuse one for the other, so where's the issue?
sharing aesthetic shouldn't be enough to prosecute, especially in the case of patents.
My biggest defense against any claim like that is that they're identifiably distinct. You put two of them side by side and not a single fan of either will be confused which is which.
There are right wing Lemmy instances? Wild.. And by the sound of it, Gross.