I can't speak to BC as I'm from NL and have only spent time in here, Ontario and Quebec.
Much of the problem here is that new developments are all low density, we have high density but it's business facing or was full since it was built, anything built from the 90s onward was low density.
Agreed, I love walking through old Montreal and Quebec City. Old cities (mostly The ones that predate the popularization of the car) feel so much more alive than other cities mostly due to their people first design and interesting architecture
The only civilian housing allowed to be built in most areas is single family, low density housing which manufactures scarcity.
There's also the requirement for driveways and huge front lawns that ensure car dependency further raising the effective cost of living.
We don't need skyscrapers but we do need something more dense than the traditional single family homes as the cost to maintain our cities and to live as individuals balloon to unforeseen levels.
We've taken a lot from Americans and lessons about how to run a city should never be one of them.
I don't even think you have to fix every issue. Human existence by nature requires us to use and change our environment and our job is to minimize that so we can continue living on this planet.
Both of those examples solve our issues to a point where they're non-existent. Yes, they're still produced but they're well within our manageable amounts and would reverse much of the damage we did if we did them on mass.
I'm not even necessarily against electric cars. I just don't want one personally, I don't think they're great or even the solution, but they're certainly better than combustion. They just still aren't great, especially when we already have the actual solutions.
Reduce, reuse, recycle in that order. Using less of something we'll always have a way bigger impact than recycling it or reusing it. This goes for electronics or anything else.
He can't and as another commenter pointed out his health panel submitted a research paper along with a recommendation to move cannabis to a schedule three drug.
He's already doing what you want it's just not loud about it so you don't know.
If you wanted to be fully legal you're going to need to start writing your congressional representatives because they're the ones who can do it
I just hope asahi Linux takes of because the M3 looks sick but I'll be fucked if I get sucked into the apple ecosystem. I'd rather be forced to use Windows on arm.
you're confusing skepticism with oppression people taking a moment to believe something from Julian assange isn't censorship, He's not exactly the most trustworthy of sources no matter how much proof he brings up but once it was clear and it was pretty quick I think pretty much everyone bought on
They weren't able to add more because a Republican Congress cut down approved funding to do so.
The emails exist and were on a personal email server that was not approved which was a security breach. The same as it was a security breach when Trump did it on his personal phone.
It's not okay but it's not as big of a deal as you're making it, moreover it's been well reported that she renounced it apologized and since corrected it, so it's more to the point that it doesn't support your original argument.
Yeah, they're doing great work.