Skip Navigation

User banner
Posts
1
Comments
594
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • 7600x and 6950XT over here, all I see is red!

  • Your premise is flawed the only reason it falls under the principles of inelastic demand is because of the way our country is structured for cars, if you use the tax to make systemic changes, making public transit and walking/biking possible this is no longer true.

    I'm not saying it's an easy transition but it is a necessary one and Norway and Denmark proves it's possible

  • Security, count that as 316 too.

  • Security, we're going to need you over in section K2, we have a code 308, multiple violations.

  • It's hard for me to self evaluation how often I'm right but if I'm asserting something with confidence I hold myself to rigorous proof.

    If I'm just chatting about beliefs it's a bit different but if I'm asserting something as fact I try not to say anything I can't show the receipts for to check myself for misinformation.

    If this process is too much work I just say nothing.

  • Fucking hate capitalism's need for infinite growth, flat sales means you're doing exactly the same as you were doing last year, if it was sustainable last year it's sustainable this year

    Especially for a company that is little more than a platform

  • Still isn't the legal definition of theft. It can morally be in your opinion

  • Sorry guess I should have been more clear. All of your examples are opinions as in not demonstrably fact.

    I don't particularly mind any OS one way or the other I'll use the best tool for the job. What I'm saying is a bad take are your proposed scenarios on piracy and ads which there's no evidence to support, in fact there's a lot to the opposite.

    This would make what you said an opinion and by my point of view a "bad take". Does that make you wrong to express them? No and I never said as much.

    So I guess I just lost the thread on your point because all of those are just opinions. I was just using a colloquialism. Which brings me back to my point that usually when I see people get heated it's because people are being bigoted.

  • Testing people like that is not a great if your looking to dissect a viewpoint sounds more like being inflammatory, especially with your word choice.

    Opinions can be bad takes. See > your examples.

  • I use notepad almost daily and I haven't noticed any crashing or slow downs. Not all increases in size are bloated I find many of the features they added to be extremely useful and 3MB is hardly consequential

  • Just saying things "as a test" is indistinguishable from defending it online. Things like body language, tone and intent do not come across as easily.

    That being said toxic people exist everywhere on the internet it's a flaw in our biology, we haven't adapted to communicating this way yet.

    That being said there's a difference between a bad take like your above examples and condoning oppression and marginalization as some political groups have do.

    One deserves to be defended vehemently.

  • Yeah, not a good look given the public image already surrounding the conflict.

  • Unfortunately much like America we have a system that punishes split votes with this is mind the question becomes less who do you want and more who do you really not want?

    Regardless this is great news and good on the NDP

  • Terrible take. Just because the system sucks doesn't mean there's no nuance between the two.

    This attitude has spurred apathy and allowed Republicans to stifle progress.

  • rule

    Jump
  • I think you need to have a talk with your youth pastor about these alternative truths.

  • Trains and trans are a more cost effective and environmentally friendly way to transport the masses. It can work to a surprisingly small populations as evidenced by all of the small disparate towns in Switzerland, Norway and Denmark that depend on them.

    Of course no solution works everywhere but cars should never be our first option.

  • Every flight prevented is tons of CO2 prevented