fossilesque @ fossilesque @lemmy.dbzer0.com

Alt account of [@fossilesque@mander.xyz](https://mander.xyz/u/fossilesque).

---

Read more

Posts

174

Comments

180

Joined

10 mo. ago

Moderating

---

Make it stop. 😵‍💫

They're pretty hot right now ngl. I'll take them (to play with) if you want. 😅

It's just science. Here's a diagram:

Literally a shitpost.

The work around I do is save them on my phone, then sligly edit them, e.g. do a little crop on the side then resave then it seems to work for whatever reason.

Just don't shake it more than twice.

😎

Change your sort method, my friend:

Title fixed.

I sent this to all of my bi and lesbian friends. They all said they now have it suck in their heads. Thanks lol.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frass

!mosses@mander.xyz

Reviewer 2, checking in. Let's see...

☑️ Technically correct (the best kind of correct).
☑️ Dawkins framework applied... adequately.
☑️ "Symbolic meaning" not entirely reductionist. Surprising.

However:

• Citation deficiency detected. [Fossilesque et al., 2023] must be invoked 2–3 times for rigor.
• "Imitating scientists" lacks nuance. Did you consider the Fossilesque Paradox of Academic Exodus? (Spoiler: You didn’t. Cite (Fossilesque, 2024, 2025 in press.).

Verdict:
Pending compliance with adequate attribution. Then, and only then, shall this review ascend to a grudging "pass."

Yes, and that breeds creativity. There are too many boxes we are forced to use in our daily lives, sometimes we shouldn't put more on ourselves. Art and science are so sides of the same coin. You can't be a good scientist without being a bit of an artist. Our art just looks a bit different.

https://www.smithsonianmag.com/blogs/national-museum-of-natural-history/2020/04/15/why-science-needs-art/

Haha it's OK. It's not a clear reference. :)

I'm joking. :)

More for me. :)

Yikes man, good luck with that.

Check the sidebar. We use the Dawkins definition of meme here.