Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)FO
Posts
15
Comments
4,524
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • Okay I'm free now.

    Im so glad you gave me this gem.

    Your response itself relies on several fallacies... false equivalence, hasty generalization, equivocation, a strawman, and non sequitur reasoning, probably more?

    You're incorrectly conflating logical fallacies (which are clear mistakes in reasoning) with inductive uncertainty or experimental limitations in science. Logical fallacies invalidate reasoning structures. Scientific reasoning explicitly includes uncertainty and error correction as fundamental principles; it's not fallacious; it's cautious and probabilistic.

    Additionally, your example of Socrates is actually demonstrating deductive validity, a different kind of reasoning entirely. Thus, your argument misrepresents logic and science simultaneously. Please correct these fallacies if you want this conversation to proceed productively

  • What an absolute bitch.

    Imposes tarriffs on China. China hits back.

    Doubles tarriffs. China hits back and says "fuck you, we're done with the tattiff game. Well play the fucking world trade game. We don't need you."

    Trump pauses tarriffs. 😳

    Reduces tarriffs. 🥺

    Lies about having phone call with Xi. 😅

    Cancels paused tarriffs. 😬

    Is now going to China, what, to beg for forgiveness? Suck Xis cock?

    Honest to god, if you voted for a strongman you're a fucking idiot. This is the most impotent pussy bullshit I have ever fucking seen. From anyone. Let alone the leader of the free world.

  • Why do we not have some brilliant mind just fully memorize all of the ins and outs of how these arise and just crush bad faith arguments by simply labeling them in real time rather than engaging with them?

    Like, if framed correctly "I don't engage in logical fallacy. I will immediately call it out, move on, and go back to the relevant topic."

    "Oh you don't care about starving children?"

    "That's an appeal to emotion. I won't engage with this obvious logical fallacy. I will address the causes of children suffering to alleviate their suffering."

    "But the cause is illegal immigrants!!!"

    "That's a strawman. I won't engage with logical fallacies. If you'd like to have a discussion about solving problems, Im all ears, but until we're done pointing fingers, this conversation is over."

  • Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • Why we know it's true

    💻 Computers can fake being people

    🧍‍♀️people don't have interesting lives, it the internet is full of interesting stories!

    🤑 Theres money to be made