foggy @ foggy @lemmy.world

Posts

15

Comments

4,523

Joined

2 yr. ago

Dear Elon,

It's not in your head. It's real, nobody loves you. Nobody will ever love you.

Sorry not sorry, Everyone

😯

-no one

Man, I don't know. I wanna know too.

I got a refurb drive in 2019 that has been clicking and rumbling a little to moderately for 6 years now. Great value at this point, but it's replacement is gathering dust...

Yesterday:

        <nav script="dropdown.js" style="dropdown.css">
      <button onclick="toggleDropdown()">Menu</button>
    </nav>


  

Today:

        // index.js
    import React from 'react';
    import ReactDOM from 'react-dom';
    import './global.css';
    import App from './App';
    
    ReactDOM.createRoot(document.getElementById('root')).render(<App />);

    // App.jsx
    import Dropdown from './components/Dropdown';
    import './App.css';

    export default function App() {
      return (
        <main>
          <Dropdown />
          <p>Hello, world!</p>
        </main>
      );
    }

    // components/Dropdown.jsx
    import { useState } from 'react';
    import styles from './Dropdown.module.css';
    import ArrowIcon from '../assets/icons/ArrowIcon.jsx';
    
    export default function Dropdown() {
      const [open, setOpen] = useState(false);
      return (
       <div className={styles.dropdown}>
          <button onClick={() => setOpen(!open)}>Menu <ArrowIcon /></button>
          {open && (
            <ul>
              <li>Option 1</li>
              <li>Option 2</li>
            </ul>
          )}
        </div>
      );
    }
  

Really, this argument you're both having ignores the greater mystery.

What the fuck is humans obsession with right angles?

• They don't represent our actual visual field
• They aren't space efficient.
• They aren't strong.

Yet we have infused them everything.

When you have black market organ money, the doctors come to you.

Tagged as edgelord laughingstock.

Or... two clearly different people?

You're not very smart, are you? 😂

Your shower thought is edgelord cringe and the fact that you can't swallow that hit to your ego is, well, yeah. We see you.

Oooh, edgy. Few problems:

List of logical fallacies

1. Hasty Generalization

"Everybody privately shit-talks everybody." Assumes a universal truth based on limited or anecdotal experience. Not everyone engages in this behavior

2. False Premise

"The phone always listens to it and records it." This is factually untrue for most users and makes the argument invalid from the start. The conclusion based on this premise (a hack turning that into texts) relies on a false understanding of technology.

3. Slippery Slope (Implied)

"A viral hack that turns all this shit-talking into texts."

Implied assumption: this will definitely go viral and cause massive disruption. It assumes a cascade of dramatic consequences without evidence.

4. Appeal to Cynicism

"Everybody privately shit-talks everybody." Uses an exaggeratedly negative view of human nature as a foundation to justify or normalize antisocial behavior.

5. Moral Equivalence

By implying that since everyone does it, exposing it via a viral hack is just revealing the "truth" and therefore not really unethical, it downplays the maliciousness of the hypothetical hack.

Basically, your entire premise is a heap of logical fallacy and edgelord cringe.

Value of assets > value of loan

Hes cash poor but has collateral.

"Horses are hung. Men are hanged."

That seems awfully low tbh...?

Having 0 documentation doesn't mean you have no DLP strategy. That's amateur hour.

And again, NB: this does not scale.

Tagged as 'bad parent'

Your posting style reeks of troll behavior. I'll be sure to interact with you less. 🥂

Top Google result.

Maybe google it before pretending you know what it does based on the name?

https://www.autoelevate.com/

Talk about something no competent IT director would do 🙄.

Autoelevate does handle this appropriately.

It automatically sends the prompt to a designated group of admin users for review. It 100% removes admin rights from end user machines.

It doesn't automatically allow anything.

https://www.autoelevate.com/

So many people in this thread responding to text without looking into anything -- talk about bad security practices.

You either: Lied about having kids

Or

Are a bad parent.

I don't care which it is, Im just letting you know that you've made this much clearer than you realize.

Gross. Tell your IT director about solutions to this problem, like autoelevate or similar. I mean there's a security tradeoff but, you can have windows prompts for admins automatically prompt an IT admin to review and enter their credentials or deny and request more info. And it's a very easy deployment for any intermediate IT person.

Edit: autoelevate DOES NOT AUTOMATICALLY ALLOW.

https://www.autoelevate.com/

Christ. I mean, bad job on the devs naming it but don't downvote me based on a couple dumbass knee jerk responses. It does this appropriately. Lemmy sucks sometimes.

You've got two huh.

Hey everyone check out this parenting expert over here! They've raised two kids 😲

That's basically 100% of human behavior, so yeah. Wow. Leashes? Can't fathom a situation that would warrant it. You're right. Everyone who has ever used a leash is correcting for a problem you're very experienced in, and found a better way for. After all, you have two kids.