As you've already touched on, company culture is everything at small companies. If you fit in well, you'll love it. If you don't, you'll hate it. I would ask to talk to other people in the company besides the CEO and talk to them about what working there is like and what kind of person would fit in well. If the CEO (I'm assuming that is who you are interviewing with) balks at the Idea, that right there tells you something.
For me, if I go to the account settings, I can pick which language I want. If you set that to English, I would guess you'd get the F1 commentary as your default audio stream.
Sentencing is a whole process in and of itself. Often consisting its own investigation and witnesses that is intended to help the judge determine what the appropriate sentence will be.
I hear ya. There are at least some other recent examples. The settlement between Fox News and Dominion. Giuliani is being held to account for libeling the Georgia poll workers. And of course all the Trump cases. But yeah, feels like a drop in the ocean.
Assuming I could be confident the coffin would hold up against the weight of the dirt, I would do it. I remember the Mythbusters tested a myth related to being buried alive. To test it, they buried Jamie in a coffin and ended up having to pull the plug because the dirt was crushing the coffin.
While Lance is not an elite driver, I dont think it's fair to say someone who has had 3 podium finishes in F1 and who is currently in ninth place in the drivers standings is out of his depth. He's a middle of the pack driver capable of the occasional above average performance.
Not that it really matters for political theater, but what confuses me about all this is how can they impeach a president for something that happened before he was president?
It's also somewhat ironic that the plaintiffs are women. It should be obvious that after they've finished dismantling the systems that help minorities, the systems that help women will be the next target.
No way he is 215, but I'm not surprised the number is something like that. I don't think he even got on the scale. They probably just asked him and accepted his answer. Like him or not, he is a former president and they are going to handle him with kid gloves. Not to mention there is a decent chance the people processing him also voted for him.
Personally, I think what they are saying is reasonable. If I start an instance with a particular goal in mind, whatever that goal may be, then I want users that will support that goal. If a user doesn't support that goal then they should go find an instance that's a better fit. That's part of the beauty of the fediverse. You aren't constrained to a single instance. Users should find instances that fit them rather than expecting instances to change to accommodate them.
They provide tools that make it easier to automate large-scale deployments of servers and applications.