floquant @ floquant @lemmy.dbzer0.com

Posts

0

Comments

256

Joined

1 yr. ago

If you see that extremely moderate (aka Democratic, aka not left) position as the "extreme left", then people who would ban cars are basically ISIS for you?

Check, check, probably not, check, check, check, check, maybe?, check, check, check and check.

Sure, everyone has seen the checks and balances in action

Isn't the name of the camp "terrorism confinement" something?

The rich and powerful are going mask off about being above the law. Fuck you lizard boy, and fuck Meta and their "products"

Nvidia is breaking their graphics driver. Rolling release distros just get fucked by it

What, you can't measure the size of a room by timing the bounces of light hitting the walls?

.msix

I never heard of AltGr reffered to as "Meta", except maybe in the sense of "Emacs modifier" which might be bound to it. Super is definitely the key between LCTL and LALT though

You can use Meta or Super as a more agnostic term

No, it's the sequel to Supersonic Acrobatic Rocket Powered Battle Cars

We needed to bring the ocean into our eyes to see

I think that it's mostly just Lemmy being less dominated by native English speakers. Many of those mistakes that seem baffling "make sense" in some other languages

Zuck: Yeah so if you ever need info about anyone at Harvard, just ask. I have over 4,000 emails, pictures, addresses, SNS

[Redacted Friend's Name]: What? How'd you manage that one?

Zuck: People just submitted it.

Zuck: I don't know why.

Zuck: They "trust me"

Zuck: Dumb fucks

the liz in 2004

Failing implies trying

Ok 👍

I think you're just reading things I didn't say bud.

Funny, to me it's kind of the opposite - we need to give diversified environments where people can feel welcome, not trying to jam everyone into one big "community" which is anything but.

I think that's what was great about the forum and personal website era. If you wanted a place where you can use edgy language and spend your time shitting on things, there's a website you could go to. Unicorns and hopeposting are over here. Nerds and geeks are over there.

That doesn't mean segregating and creating ideology bubbles. Everyone can visit and be part of any, and can stay well away from the ones you know you don't like. Take /b/ for example: it is famous for having a certain demographic, and if you don't want to see it, you simply don't go there. It's not in your face, they're happy about not having "normies" there, you're happy about not having them in your digital home, every one wins. And if you're ever in a certain mood and would like to venture in the woods, it's there.

The same set of rules can't fit all the possible users, purposes, times, etc. And although I also subscribed to the thought bubble theory , the counterargument that it's actually the opposite - the lack of "social glue" between participants in discussions, made a lot of sense to me.

Kurzgesagt - The Internet Is Worse Than Ever - Now What? (YT)

I'm not sure what your point is frankly.

You are first and foremost responsible for your own actions.

So you think countries should recognize and punish themselves for "being the bad guys"?

Do you see any country as having the "required moral standing" to judge others?