floo @ floo @retrolemmy.com

Posts

4

Comments

734

Joined

4 mo. ago

It would be a logical fallacy to jump to such a conclusion without interviewing a randomly sampled and much larger population.

Except that it is. And I’ve told you that, several times.

It’s like you have ignored every comment I have made so far. For the IDF of soldiers, there is a huge amount of pluralistic evidence to support this. And for the Wehrmacht soldiers, there is a huge amount of historical evidence that supports this, too.

You don’t wanna be convinced, you just wanna argue a single point and ignore anything that is contrary to it.

All of this information is very publicly available. Since you are so adverse to taking my word for it, go look at these facts up for yourself.

As you are clearly sea lining rather than arguing in good faith, I’m going to block you now.

Have a wonderful time go fuck yourself

I already conceded that there are very likely, in fact, I’m sure of it, members of the IDF that are not there willingly and do not support its goals. The point I’m trying to make is that the proportion IDF soldiers that support Zionism is much higher than the number of supporters of Nazis in the Wehrmacht.

Many members of the Wehrmacht were fighting for Germany, not the Nazis. Every single member of the IDF, except for perhaps a few exceptions, are absolutely fighting for Zionism.

I didn’t just see one interview. It was dozens of interviews over the last 20 or so years. If it was just one piece, I would probably agree with you (as I have clearly stated multiple times). And I’m sure there are members of the IDF who are not there willingly and do not support its goals.

But I have a preponderance of evidence which supports my position.

My point is, again, that IDF soldiers are far more loyal, willing, and supportive of the socio/geopolitical goals of Zionist Israel than soldiers of the Wehrmacht were supportive of the Nazi Germany.

The identity politics of being a Zionist are far more… all-encompassing then were the identity politics of being a Nazi.

Stop defending Nazis just because you are extremely ignorant of historical facts and contemporaneous attitudes.

Yes, your explanation is more succinct. I was just trying to add a bit of historical context and comparative analysis.

Probably. I’d like some further analysis on that, but I am definitely inclined to agree with you.

Wrong. They were sworn to Germany, and nothing else.

The vast majority of them also joined so they didn’t starve to death. And in the second half of the war, it was forced conscription. They said what they had to say not to get shot in the head. While I don’t doubt that many, even most, were loyal to the Nazis, a lot of of them were not. a great many joined because they had no other choice.

It’s a historical detail that is worth mentioning

I don’t know if that’s really a counterpoint. The Nazis started as a terrorist organization.

And I’d argue that, based on available historical evidence, a lot of the Wehrmacht were fighting for Germany, not the Nazis (a subtle distinction, I know, but I think an important one in this context), whereas IDF soldiers, according to many interviews with them, are definitely fighting for both Israel and Zionism. I would argue that IDF soldiers are far more committed to their geo/sociopolitical cause than were the typical soldier in the Wehrmacht.

The IDF’s fascist zeal is more akin to that of the SS. Although, as an organization, the US Department of Immigration and Customs Enforcement is far more similar to the Nazi SS.

You know, at one point during this war, I thought, “they’re compelled to service, most of them probably don’t wanna be there, and we can’t hold them responsible for the orders of the state.”

Then I saw some interviews with some IDF soldiers. Then I saw more interviews. And it’s the same in recent interviews: they are happy to be there, and they absolutely love genociding Palestinians.

Fuck the IDF

Are you? Don’t bother answering. I’m blocking you.

Exactly as the Nazis planned

I’m very sorry, I missed the part when you said you didn’t know the user password. My bad!

It sounds like the way that the user space is managed in your bios won’t permit any other alternatives other than the possibility of deleting the user account using the administrator account? Is that possible?

You’re not gonna be able to reset that password unless you know it. That’s kind of the point of the password. Unfortunately, it seems that your bios does not allow for you to change the user password without knowing the old one, but it may let you delete the account altogether and re-create it with a new password. That however, may cause a bunch of other problems that I can’t really predict without knowing a lot more information.

Don’t try doing this until we talked about this a bit more.

Did you try typing in the user password instead of the admin password when it asks for a password?

It probably wants you to authenticate as that user in order to delete the password requirement for it. The admin account probably doesn’t let you alter any of the settings for a different user. User space management with bios is often limited.

“LOOK AT ME EVERYONE! LOOK AT MEEEE!!!”

No such thing

Remember, kiddies: the first Pride was a riot!

Because I have nothing to offer

Ah, yes, the world before refined sugar, lol

And even if it’s not sweet, it can at least be tangy, sour, or tart.

Black licorice just taste like fucking death

Black licorice. Or anything containing black licorice. It’s just fucking disgusting.

State terrorism: a critical tool for the Nazis