But you didn’t cite that. Is there a reason to leave that out of your citation?
Obviously there is a reason, but not the one you are implying. I did not cite it because it does not matter. I can also not go with "I am not an architect, but I think you misplanned, there should have definitely been a structural change to support this and that".
Looks absolutely well-planned and not rushed at all, perfect alignment of the logo, proper copy. Definitely not just a hasty implementation of a fever dream.
I am a lowly and unusually stupid software dev, but I want to be less terrible.
Something every good dev said during their career :) Nice community, subscribed!
Do you believe a mother can love her adopted child and the other way around? Then you have your answer.
You love her, she loves you. Do you need any more labeling (it is absolutely fine if you do, just something to think about)?
You do not give many details, but you fucked over someone who seems to have done nothing wrong? And you did it as "payback" for something that has nothing to do with them? Not mature at all. The ones you walked out on might have dodged a bullet there.
I see that too, and it is beyond me why that sticks. OP could be a much happier person if they would spend their time with actual problems. Or no problems at all.
Obviously there is a reason, but not the one you are implying. I did not cite it because it does not matter. I can also not go with "I am not an architect, but I think you misplanned, there should have definitely been a structural change to support this and that".
Obviously I did actually try it. It works.