fireweed @ fireweed @lemmy.world

Posts

5

Comments

413

Joined

2 yr. ago

Apparently the gardening and eco/tiny-house world is very wholesome, because that's 75% of what I watch (not including music) and I never see recommendations for ragebait.

There is a subscription page! I had no idea for years that in addition to the home page (which is a mix of subscription and algorithm videos) there's a subscription page which only lists videos from channels you're subscribed to, in order of recency.

Everyone makes fun of California's prop 65 warnings, but this is exactly the situation they exist for: knowing which colorful plate sets to avoid at Crate & Barrel.

You say this like we don't still have kitchenware with lead (or other nasties like cadmium) in them, often for purely aesthetic reasons. Most of these are discontinued products still in circulation, but some are still being produced (in theory they're "safe for use" because the heavy metals are sealed behind something nontoxic, but scratches and chips may expose them).

Sooo are centipedes like fruit flies and not engage in any real form of sexual selection, or is the female going around judging the fuck out of every jizz pile she encounters?

"Mmm-mm, look at that poor viscosity, obviously from a low-quality male. This one on the other hand: deep color, firm texture, nice and sticky... clearly produced by a male with the superior genes I want to pass along to my offspring."

There is plenty of grain-free food out there; it's even a search option on chewy. The problem is the grain filler is often replaced by something else that's either not nutritious for cats or possibly even harmful (like potato and peas), and that still doesn't resolve the moisture content issue.

My cat gets both with every meal. My understanding is that wet food is much more nutritious, if for no other reason than the moisture content. Fortunately my cat is pretty good about drinking water, but getting enough hydration can be a problem for some individuals. My cat will usually eat the wet food first, then snack on the dry food over the next few hours.

I've watched family cats rack up huge vet bills and cause much heartache because they received improper nutrition; wet food may be way more expensive and inconvenient, but it's a worthwhile investment (same as with humans!)

It really depends on mode of transportation, especially if a car is involved or not. I suspect a number of people in this thread are folks who drive most/all places and aren't including all the stuff they have stashed in their cars, available if needed. Also, driving means minimal exposure to the elements, so even less stuff is needed to stay comfortable/presentable than if you are walking, biking, waiting at transit stations, etc.

As a former Tokyo resident I'll also add that I used to carry a folding fan around with me in summer when I lived there, but I have no need in the US where air conditioning is so prevalent (to the point of overuse). I also stopped needing a fan so much, regardless of temperature, when living in less humid places.

Also, shocked more people aren't mentioning a water bottle. I bring a reusable water bottle with me any time I have to leave the house for more than a couple of hours, especially if I'm cycling somewhere but even if I'm driving. How are y'all staying hydrated sans water bottle???

For the curious, the first Native American governor was Johnston Murray, Oklahoma governor from 1951-1955.

Okay but if Arizona and New Mexico's mountain regions get forest cutouts, central Washington needs a grasslands cutout to represent its shrub-steppe habitat.

Obligatory "wet food is much better for cats if for no other reason than the moisture content"

Cats are apparently one of those species that's used to getting most of their fluids via their prey, and can be bad at drinking enough water when fed a dry food diet (in my experience this is highly dependent on the individual cat: some are "picky drinkers").

Years ago, when I was super into manga and anime, I tried to get into One Piece because of how popular it was getting (it was still finding its footing in the US but it was huge in Japan). I read the first few volumes of the manga and watched the first dozen or so anime episodes. It was well made but nothing about it grabbed me in a way that made me the least bit excited to continue (or even understand its wild popularity), especially compared to other shonen series at the time. The plot didn't immediately hook me, and I guess neither the characters nor the premise/setting were interesting enough to keep me going until it did. Given how long the series has gone on for, I'm relieved I never got into it.

Anyone else struggle to find One Piece enjoyable?

I think Costco glasses are a good deal, even if you have to buy a one-year membership to get them. Don't know if they're available online, but don't you want to try glasses on in person to make sure they fit and are comfortable?

Audiences aren't sick of superhero movies, they're sick of BAD superhero movies.

Societal pressure to have children is a huge factor for sure. I've heard from previous generations in my family that during the baby boom era, rumors would circulate in their community if you didn't have enough children, like "something must be wrong with the Johnsons down the street because they only ever had two kids" (and this was in upper-middle class WASP America).

Obviously this attitude continues today in certain communities (Mormons, small rural towns, etc), but it's no longer as prevalent.

This appears to be a case of "best practices" that's perhaps so good it's excessive when put together. I'll try to explain as succinctly as I can.

As you can see in these two examples, having the pedestrian crosswalk to a bus stop raised where it crosses the bike lane is a standard design. The floating bus island reduces bus-bike conflict and speeds up bus time by removing the need to merge in and out of the travel lane. Meanwhile it also preserves the protected bike lane and, depending on design, gives folks waiting for the bus a nice space not immediately next to automotive traffic to sit/stand. However this design introduces potential pedestrian-bike conflict, especially in urban contexts where road space is cramped, visibility is poor, and/or people exiting the bus or moving from the sidewalk to the bus island do not have a lot of space and may unexpectedly (from the perspective of bike riders) enter the bike lane. Rushing to catch a bus that's about to depart especially can cause people to have blinders and suddenly enter into the bike lane without looking because they're too focused on the bus. For accessibility reasons it's best to have the path across the bike lane raised to sidewalk level but only for the duration of the crossing (otherwise you end up with people walking or even standing around waiting in the bike lane).

Finally there's the fragile political alignment of people on foot and people on bicycles; these two groups should be allies in the fight against car dominance but our road and even recreational systems have often pitted the two against each other: it's very common to hear pedestrians especially complain about near-misses with bicycles, particularly on shared paths ("I was walking my dog and this speeding cyclist appeared out of nowhere and almost ran us over!" "I was riding my bike and this inattentive pedestrian's dog abruptly jumped into my path and I had to swerve to avoid them both!"). Reducing conflict between these two groups of road users to keep them allied is critical for political reasons in many places, and this means slowing cycling speed near the conflict zone (via the speed bump) while also keeping the conflict zone reduced to just one or maybe two specific crossing areas (indicated by the elevated crossing).

All the above seems like overkill in the example cited above because these "best practices" were designed for cramped urban environments, such as major automotive corridors with multiple lanes through city centers that recently had a lane or two converted to bike/bus/ped infrastructure via a major "road diet" or bus enhancement project. But here there's a huge bus island, an extra wide bike lane (because it's for two-way use), great visibility, the waiting area is on the bus island rather than the sidewalk, etc. so while these best practices probably are still effective, they aren't as necessary for reducing bike-ped conflict as in other contexts. As to why there's no speed bump in the automotive lanes, the bus island itself may provide sufficient traffic calming by breaking up the monotony of the roadway, and most importantly, a speed bump would greatly reduce comfort of bus riders. Speed bumps are not meant as "punishment" to one form of transportation or another; they're a tool that's only rolled out to solve a specific issue.

I hope this helps explain why this spot is designed as it is, and why this is a poor example of "unfair" road design.

Why sex bias in labs means women are the losers in research into ageing virtually all medical issues

FTFY

Apparently menstrual cycles (and the resulting fluctuating hormones) make the female body tOo CoMpLiCaTeD for researchers and they'd rather stick to the "default human model." Bitch study some fetal developmental science: female is the default model!

I'm pretty sure it's the steam version (it was purchased from there... The game worked fine until suddenly it didn't anymore, and troubleshooting hasn't been fruitful)

Same question, but for Civilization III and VI 😩

There's a huge difference between losing your temper when controlling a digital go-kart versus a real-life one-ton vehicle.

It's a good first step that you recognize this is a problem, but it needs to be followed up with actions you can take when it occurs. In the case of driving, if your impulse is to follow the driver who pissed you off, you need to get off the road at the very first safe opportunity (a side street, a freeway exit, a parking lot, whatever) to give yourself a chance to cool down and both mentally and physically distance yourself from the situation. It doesn't matter how much of a jerk the other party is (again, unless they are actively putting people in danger, in which case you should be pulling over to call emergency services); when you're on the road the only thing you should be concerned with is your own behavior. There is zero justification for escalation; you are not teaching the other person a lesson, you are putting people's lives at risk over a minor slight.

I used to work in transportation and you wouldn't believe the horror stories. Please don't underestimate how quicky and easily road rage situations can turn ugly; it's never worth it.