Exile used to be a tempting idea to me too, but it's a bit of an "out of sight out of mind" solution. The exiled will end up somewhere, and likely damage the environment and original inhabitants of the area. Just like the first colonialists destroyed the food sources of Sydney's Aboriginal population in the late 1700's (and that's before we get to the possibly-intentional spreading of smallpox).
Even if we could ethically-ish dump them on the moon, you'd just be creating a hostile neighbour. Sci fi has already well and truly explored the possible outcomes of that scenario for us.
Unfortunately, we as a society made them, we've got to be the ones who contain and prevent the damage they cause. And somehow, we need to do it ethically too.
Of course people with disabilities are getting exploited and ripped off, so is everyone in a system where profit is the motive.
But at least I can eat my favourite foods now while it happens. Not many other forms of exploitation provide me with any value at all. And the purpose-built disability service providers where I am are often some of the most exploitative, because they know their clients are vulnerable. Uber just thinks I'm lazy.
Thanks for such a detailed response, but I confess I do already understand the principle! I was actually just idly wondering what the delta on air+water pressure vs water or air only would be and how to calculate what diameters/speeds would be necessary to achieve certain heights/output.
I may have been tempted to build a mini version for the completely unnecessary reason of automating my plant watering with a spare tiny 3V solar panel that may no longer even work and some other trash. Just ADHD things.
Smoke detectors frequently work by having a teensy little radioactive emitter and a teensy radioactivity detector somewhere close to it. It works a bit like a laser trap in a video game or movie, if you break the laser-beam by walking through it, it triggers the alarm because the detector can no longer see the beam.
But it doesn't have to be smoke. Water particles will do it, dust can do it, especially when there's construction work going on putting the dust in the air... it doesn't matter. It just needs to be enough to break the connection between emitter and detector.
Wet steam and the vapor from humidifiers is pretty effective at triggering it because the droplets are bigger than regular humidity.
The premier said he had confidence in the LECC and the police’s internal processes to review their own conduct.
Right after the Royal Commission into Violence, Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation of People with Disability released a full volume on Criminal justice and people with disability.
Here were some of the recommendations if you understandably haven't read the 5000 page report. Including old mate Minns, who should have at least been fucking briefed on the big highlighted boxes in each section called "key points" and "recommendations".
State and territory governments should uphold the rights of people with disability who are in custody. Consistent with article 14 of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD), all corrective service and youth justice agencies should provide people with disability the disability supports they need while in custody. ... to place them in the same position, so far as feasible, as other people in custody.
The Australian Government’s implementation of the UN Optional Protocol for the Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (OPCAT) heightens the obligation to ensure that people with disability deprived of their liberty are protected...
Each jurisdiction will nominate its own body to monitor compliance with OPCAT in places of detention. ...such as the Ombudsman or the Inspector of Custodial Services in each particular state or territory...
...the Australian Government, in
consultation with the state and territory governments, should support the development of a human rights education and training strategy that includes disability awareness training for National Preventive Mechanisms (NPMs), detention authorities and their staff. - section 2.4
And that doesn't even touch all of the justice system recommendations.
It's much easier to be xenophobic when there are no rumours or evidence that a culture has worthwhile inventions and knowledge. It's also easier to stamp out cultures which rely mostly on oral history and have a strong tradition of secrecy, even within immediate families. Even though Aboriginals didn't have writing, many had detailed maps. It's just that they were in a temporary medium like sand accompanied by stories that were memorised.
I only clued in maybe 6 years ago that it wasn't just clueless arrogant colonialists killing people for their land and not knowing what indigenous farms looked like; and that the claims of deliberate cultural erasure had real weight. I was lucky enough to meet by chance some aboriginal educators who pointed me to actual physical evidence like the grinding stones. Had I never met them I may not have known.
I could not explain, without it being at least partially intentional, how we weren't taught that we knew Australia's native peoples baked bread 20k years before anywhere else in the world. And how we were even told they had no bread or buildings.
So when I see things like "they didn't have fire", especially a week before the referendum... I just can't even. We're asking a bunch of people who were taught lies and some who intentionally spread them to decide on the worthiness of a genocided minority group. It's just tragic.
We have evidence of ovens from 4000 years ago, so very much yes. They always have, and it is baffling to me that anyone would say otherwise. Even 20 years ago nobody claimed bizarre things like that.
If you're not familiar with Australian Aboriginal and Torres Strait islander cultures generally, the Deadly Stories history timeline and the rest of the site gives a good high level overview from an aboriginal perspective. Especially for the creation stories which is a core similarity between different groups. There's some who claim elements in the stories go as far back as when there were still megafauna. True? No idea. But fun to consider.
Bruce Pascoe wrote Dark Emu in 2019 which is a very important book about agriculture and tech that upset a lot of people. I've linked you a page that contains a brief summary plus links to academic responses to it, because it did cause controversy. Apologies for the school-age-centric link, there's a big push in education right now to teach kids about the aboriginal stuff they didn't teach adults, so links to aboriginal science tend to be at this level or uni research papers.
The whole movie about the writing of that book, criticism and backlash is up on ABC iView - The Dark Emu Story if you're keen for something more human that gets into the racism of erasing aboriginal science too. A shit VPN might be needed, but I doubt ABC has done much more to geoblock.
Older article on fire as land management by aboriginal peoples with a few pics is a good entry point for that topic. Fire is a huge part of many aboriginal groups, so the idea they didn't have it is frankly ridiculous on the surface. Like they only ate raw food and huddled in caves for warmth for 60k years or something, i mean come on.
And just because I enjoy it, this map of the aboriginal groups in Australia. Also because people keep talking about Aboriginal Australians as though they are a monolith. There are at least 250 languages.
Aboriginals didn’t even have a way to make fire, write, make wheels, or farm.
Incorrect, indigenous Australians used fire extensively for land management. They were the first society in the world that we have evidence of milling seed for flour (36k years ago), they had yam plantations, built stone weirs for fish farming, and a bunch of other things. The reason people believe they didn't is because their way of life was systematically erased and dismissed as 'primitive' by the colonialists.
They didn't use wheels, because many groups used waterways for transport instead. Other groups were on land where the environment wasn't really conducive to wheeled transport.
They also didn't have writing, instead relying on an extensive oral history, as many cultures have.
Please don't spread misinformation.
Australians want to burn coal and spread hateful lies in the international media.
Largely incorrect as well, even if Australians are having issues with their government and the mining/energy industries.
If this surprises people, they're going to flip when they find that most research is privately funded by people with a vested interest. This is why public science funding is so important, it provides research with an alternate motive. Somewhere in the middle of all the ulterior research motives, public and private, you can find something closer to the truth.
which we rarely did because life was so hard there
I took the alternate route and put myself in the middle of the city. Can't fuck with me as much when there are fewer metres involved.
And it’s especially bad when it’s a temporary setup. If you want to have a pedestrian only area then make it pedestrian only 24/7/365.
Agreed. The pedestrianisation of George St was successful because there were alternate parallel routes to use, public transport was built in, and additional permanent public accommodations built.
The idea of especially King St Newtown shutting down temporarily is horrifying. If for no other reason than emergency services getting stuck in endless one way lanes. That's before we get to the overcrowded public transport and totally fucked paths.
Exile used to be a tempting idea to me too, but it's a bit of an "out of sight out of mind" solution. The exiled will end up somewhere, and likely damage the environment and original inhabitants of the area. Just like the first colonialists destroyed the food sources of Sydney's Aboriginal population in the late 1700's (and that's before we get to the possibly-intentional spreading of smallpox).
Even if we could ethically-ish dump them on the moon, you'd just be creating a hostile neighbour. Sci fi has already well and truly explored the possible outcomes of that scenario for us.
Unfortunately, we as a society made them, we've got to be the ones who contain and prevent the damage they cause. And somehow, we need to do it ethically too.