Yep. I got real suspicious when the first list said August, which is when I noticed it said that I should also look at the "more comprehensive" list. I opened that up and thought "yeah, yesterday, that sounds about right".
The last one was August 26th according to this wikipedia list, which is 60 days ago. But there were 2 in August 3 days apart, so... I guess it has been a while by comparison.
But only if you don't look at this other list on Wikipedia. This list has only 1 of a chosen set of sources who referred to it as a mass killing, the other lists mass killings where 2+ of their sources called it a mass killing. I wonder how long the 3+ sources list will be before it gets it own fork.
I remember a time when each would be the center of news for at least a week.
Cuba makes sense when you look through the CIA documents that are released after a set period of time has elapsed. I recommend checking them out, they're interesting to read.
Spoilers: [spoiler] They did not like mostly peaceful neighbours doing left-wing stuff with success. It provided evidence that it might work elsewhere. [/spoiler]
You don't have to hate minorities to not prioritize fixing problems which predominantly harm minorities. People focus on problems which affect them, because there are a lot of problems worth fixing.
So when there is a police department staffed primarily by the most powerful demographic, it is pretty clear to marginalised people that they're not prioritizing the problems that reinforce existing systemic barriers put in place by people who... maybe did hate minorities at least a little.
So then those people affected by the continuing problem find ways of bringing it to the majority's attention in ways which are less likely to be ignored. This one was pretty successful, and even better, didn't cause anyone physical harm in the process.
Would it be fair to say that you are representative of the majority demographics in your area, or even the majority of the most local powerful demographic?
The reason I ask is because I often find that the people who are confused/surprised by protests like these are not typically from members of groups who experience over-representation in the criminal justice system. As in, the people who are less likely to experience the problem first or even second hand are more surprised when the problem is finally highlighted for them through novel methods.
Yeah, I hear you, fair point. I can't recall CVE numbers off the top of my head either.
Heartbleed was also a great name, whereas iLeakage is... a choice.
I'll probably be referring to it as 'the latest Safari security failure', hopefully they can ensure that description stays relevant for a few weeks.
“The experiment is bullshit, we just can’t measure shit.”
The experiment is limited by our existing tools and evidence, and this will impact both its accuracy and our interpretation of the results, but it's the best we have for now and still worthwhile as a way of producing additional evidence for other researchers.
Also, researchers typically don't condense information into soundbites well, which prevents people from easily understanding and remembering the accurate information. Which allows bad interpretations by other people of the researchers interpretations of rough results to gain traction.
In other words, normal science problems.
An experiment isn't bullshit just because we can't achieve perfection in methodology or human analysis. And we can't refine our theories and tools without multiple inaccurate answers being compared to find congruence.
The bullshit starts with the people whose theories which rely on the inaccurate parts refuse to modify the theory when the evidence disagrees.
No problem. We all rely on our experiences to form first assumptions/reactions, and it can be very easy to forget the wild and diverse ways our bodies vary!
Anytime I catch myself thinking something is an unnecessary convenience, I ask myself what might make it a necessity for someone. I think it helpfully reframes situations to see the good intentions and effort that went into the solutions.
For people who have full body ability, yes. Those are most people, but very much not all. Automation of basic tasks is helpful, when they're done with proper safety protocols.
People with disabilities exist, and these products are extremely helpful to them living independently. Not all home cutting devices are great for all disability types, eg. Slapchops are bad for people with hand arthritis, people with only one operational arm, etc.
Because Apple are pieces of shit which force Safari to underpin any Web interaction on those devices, which wouldn't be such a problem if mobile Safari were worth a damn.
But you're right and it's a valid point. I did miss that sentence on initial read and had forgotten about that problem. Thanks for the reminder!
My hope is that Engoron is baiting him to say/do more egregious things to really justify a proper sentence, because he knows Trump will keep pushing the envelope. But Occam's Razor suggests he might just be cowardly.
Come on Engoron, defy the razor. Show us all what you got.
They're also legally liable for content on their app store, which is one of the big (maybe biggest) reasons they bother to monitor it so carefully. Their app store moderation is genuinely heavy-handed at the best of times, but it makes sense for them to distance themselves from Telegram in this case.
It also entirely makes sense that Telegram has only limited their changes to Android as a response. Apple customers are where the money is at anyway.
One can only hope. I'm sure we won't have to wait long to find out.