faythofdragons @ faythofdragons @slrpnk.net

Posts

1

Comments

358

Joined

7 mo. ago

Not directly, but you're contributing to the profit of the platform.

So you'll keep giving money to Musk because X is convenient?

Just make sure the source code gets posted to Github

Three things, don't forget that American companies got a lot of European contracts to help rebuild after WWII. There's too many people out there that ignore that influx of money and try to say the economic boom of the 50s was because misogyny and racism worked.

I haven't done it in decades, so I don't know if it's changed, but there used to be an option called flying standby. You'd buy a ticket without a seat assigned, and you'd just go to the gate and wait to see if a flight went to your destination with an empty seat you could claim. It was cheaper, but no guarantee of getting a flight.

An "introduction" to lemmy that's buried behind clicking through vague smalltext, and not any of the brightly colored buttons enticing you to pick a server.

This is bad UX.

Yeah, for some reason I was thinking you were trying to say that bolting on widgets made it no longer a search engine.

I see, you're splitting the UI from the backend as two different things, and Im seeing them as parts to a whole.

then send them to the user to be displayed

This is where my understanding breaks. Why would displaying it as a summary mean the backend process is no longer a search engine?

Maybe I just don't know what "generating results" means. You query a search engine, and it generates results as a page of links. I don't understand how generating a page of links is fundamentally different from generating a summation of the results?

What do you mean its not generating the results? If the summation isn't generated, wheres it come from?

I had to tell DDG to not give me an AI summary of my search, so its clearly intended to be used as a search engine.

Implying I didn't feel old then, lmao

I have more money than she does.

Spoiler, that means you're the one that's out of touch here.

I generally agree then. Personally, I feel like we should focus more on individualized care needs and not so much on demographics, since differences between individuals are far greater than differences between demographics. Good doctors already allow personal needs to override any demographic-based assumptions, but it's still unfortunately common to find bias in medicine.

Your example of blue eyes not being scientific racism came across as defending RFK's stance, so my apologies if I misread. I am against denying care to anybody for any reason.

The problem is that RFK is essentially saying that, not that you said it. Genetic differences shouldn't be used as a "reason" to deny people proper medical care.

Nah, the problem is extrapolating that into "dark eyes don't need sunglasses".

If y'all want to burn the white house down again, I'll bring marshmallows for us to roast on the flames.