The toppings should still follow normal food rules, so maybe not so much the bacon, unless sweet bacon is a thing that exists? But otherwise, yeah - no reason why not :)
My personal rule is "carbohydrate bases are mostly interchangeable".
If a topping works on bread/toast, it also works on a pizza base, Yorkshire pudding, noodles, chips (fries), rice, pasta, pancake etc
For example - tomato sauce, mozzarella, basil and pepperoni works on a pizza. I can confirm it is still delicious on toast, pasta, rice, Yorkshire Pudding, chips.
Controversially, this means sweet pancake toppings should also work on pizza bases or noodles.
Therefore this would mean that Nutella on pasta is probably pretty nice.
I always kind of felt they should consider popping them all in a student style halls of residence. 4 bathrooms and 2 kitchens per 20 people. If you need something "posher", you can pay for it yourself.
Also rather than sticking it right down at the bottom of the country, pop it in the middle, in Birmingham or Leeds or somewhere suchlike. There's not a lot of reason to have all the government decisions made in London.
I didn't realise this option existed - and it's an interesting one, perhaps giving the ease-of-use of Mate/Cinnamon/Gnome 2, without sticking with the older code.
How's it meant to be pronounced? I've only ever seen it written down.
Chick feeler?
Chick filler?
Chick fill urgh
Chick fill Ah
I just don't understand what they're trying to call it. Unless it is "filler", my best guess is something like "fillet", though I can't make the letters match up with the words.
When compared to the "old 90's style" of learning around the subject, and looking at exciting ways to work with and interpret materials, by passionate teachers who make the process engaging and interesting - what is it about overworked, undersupported staff at underfunded schools, owned by for-profit Academy groups, and teaching Michael Gove's "learn a mindless list of things and repeat what the teacher said" that's failing to engage students?
They can't really tell the difference between "front hands" and "back hands". Your "back hands" (feet) have a stronger scent of you on them, and also, due to your height and bipedal nature, your "back hands" are the part they see most and closest.
I think there's definitely something in your line of thinking. In modern terms, there's a lot retconning in the New Testament to make the books add up as a series. They spend the whole "intro" persuading you it follows a direct lineage over ~2000 years.
There's some pretty wild "fan theories". Some say it's correcting the "errors", "corruption of language over time" or "devil influence" of the older book, others say OT "YHWH" is not NT "God almighty", but an unrelated angry local God.
They all claim "Newest is truest" - even the more controversial "later sequels".
They're fine with the Old Testament, it's got plenty of treachery, rape, slavery and fraud cheered on by God, mixed in with smiting and destroying things that disagree with you.
They have a problem with the teachings of Christ in the New Testament, which is all a bit too "someone was different to me so I made friends with them and we ate together".
Yep. I'd eat that on pasta, toast, Yorkshire pudding :)