explore_broaden @ explore_broaden @midwest.social

Posts

0

Comments

223

Joined

2 yr. ago

It looks like it was made by a neuroscience lab to test how quickly people can learn to use a “Hand Augmentation Device,” I’m not really sure I would call that 3d printing enthusiasts.

This is a really good point, but I’m still curious how bad actors are doing the actual wiretapping on any more than a targeted scale.

I mean it’s as secure as standard phone call, which most people are comfortable giving things like SSN over, no?

What on earth is this video from; I’ve never seen it before.

Does the EU actually have any laws that would prevent a company from doing whatever they want to try to fight ad blockers? I mean it would be really cool if they did, but I would be shocked if any government required a company not to try to prevent users from circumventing the way they make money.

Same, that combination never causes me any problems (I use uMatrix too which is always causing problems, but I get to decide which domains to allow cookies, scripts, and XHR requests from/to).

Why?

Settings > Appearance > Other (at the bottom) > Display Votes

No I still agree that we are far from LLMs being ‘thinking’ enough to be anywhere near this. But if we had a bunch of models similar to LLMs that could actually think, or if we really needed to select a person, I do think it would be possible to evaluate a bunch of the models/people to determine which ones are good at distinguishing fake information.

All I’m saying is I don’t think the limitation is actually our ability to select for capability in distinguishing fake information, I think the only limitation is fundamental to how current LLMs work.

I think that’s more a function of the fact that it’s difficult to verify that every one of the over 1M college graduates each year isn’t a “moron” (someone very bad about believing things other people made up). I think it would be possible to ensure a person has these critical thinking skills with a concerted effort.

I’m reading “decent review” as “put in the effort to make a thorough review” instead of “good review,” and I definitely agree that by accepting the free product they should be agreeing to put some effort into the review.

Given that anyone can access the posts, I would say that anyone (AI companies) can access the posts.

Voyager works great for me.

I do this on Hyprland all the time, but it’s a tiling window manager. I’m not sure any desktop environments have support for it.

Given the statement was by the US organization NOAA they probably mean night in North America.

That is very strange, I wonder why Fortune feels the need to add that text. Why doesn’t the ‘embed title’ (or whatever it’s called) match the article title?

Why did you add Elon Musk to the headline? I think we all know who runs Tesla, is it really necessary to mention him every time?

I think they meant the comment as a whole doesn’t really make sense, it’s a bunch of technical terms kind of shoved together. If you understand it can you explain what it means?

Advertising screens on gas pumps (with sound too!) are already a thing here and I hate it.

Hallucinations in the article? “This phenomenon occurs because the Moon's apparent size in the sky, due to its proximity to Earth, is roughly the same size as some celestial objects like Mars.” The moon is definitely not the same size as mars in the sky.