Skip Navigation

User banner
Posts
4
Comments
248
Joined
12 mo. ago

  • You know that saying, two is better than one.

  • You passed stingy bois ocular patdown.

  • Yeah I think so too, I got the joke, I'm just emphasizing that this isn't some spooky "socialism for the rich", it's literally just capitalists doing capitalism in a very capital way.

  • Sorry for late reply:

    They can’t form a political party. Right?

    All I really know is it's their stated aim.

    Plenty of their spokespeople are capable of being careful with their words, and they have lots of experience with woof-whistling. So it might not be nazi in name, just platforming the same policies. But, on the other hand, we have had Nazi electoral parties before: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Socialist_Party_of_Australia , and we have white nationalist parties still existing: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Australia_First_Party

    It's legal to be a complete piece of shit if you're calm and smart with your words. Hate speech laws can only do so much.

  • One of the important points is people sharing the uncensored message. This is a cut-and-dry example of unintentional promotion. For example, I tried looking up the initial news on /r/Melbourne and the mod team wisely said something like "The Guardian has chosen not to share the image in their article and we will do the same", locking the thread so that no accounts, whether sincere curious people or Nazi astroturfers, can say " what did it say", "it said X, how fucked up", "omg how can this happen?". That's an example of the no platform tactics , which given the nazis' goals, is an effective tactic in the arsenal.

    On the other hand, you're right that Tanuki is raising awareness of the event. I think their perspective is, if they have a platform, it's best to make crystal clear how pathetic these people are behind their anonymity. (And I'm not saying that as a blind claim, these people have had their own members embezzle them, get repeatedly infiltrated by current affairs shows, have major financial donors lose their jobs and half their members and promoters are headed to the camps one train after the socialists and Jewish). Their recruiting effort relies on trying to show they're better than all those failed neo-Nazi groups like Patriot Front and Atomwaffen, so we if we must talk about them (ignorance doesn't work), we should make sure to laugh at them too, show we have a community willing to fight these alienated tourist flash mobbers.

    And I think you raise an excellent point about unnecessarily naming a specific group, pointing potential recruits towards them more easily and making it a more common name to hear. I would be guilty of that too.

  • Out of all the countries to take high-speed rail inspiration from, I would hold off until that US line is actually operating.

  • Juan Manuel Sánchez Gordillo, Mayor of Marinaleda from 1979 to 2023 (among other things) has been described exactly as a "modern Robin Hood" in newspapers[1], especially in reference to their supermarket raids:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Juan_Manuel_S%C3%A1nchez_Gordillo

    In mid August 2012, Sánchez Gordillo attracted considerable media attention both within Spain and internationally due to his role in raids on supermarkets in nearby towns, Seville and Cádiz, where food was stolen and handed out to poor families and to food banks. The items stolen were part of a list chiefly made of rice, sugar, pasta, milk, olive oil and flour. Sánchez Gordillo did not personally remove food, but was outside in the car parks while members of his union conducted the raids. Several of these members have been arrested and later released, though Sánchez Gordillo himself has immunity from prosecution. Sánchez Gordillo has however said he is happy to waive his immunity and go to jail for his cause, in fact he said he expected to be jailed in order to make his message spread further.

  • And stole from the poor, not the rich.

    If anything, a software pirate at home is a far greater example.

  • And I'm also surprised it was higher for 25-44 than 15-24, although it could simply be that vehicle accidents knocked it down a spot.

  • It's complicated.

    Unfortunately, the Wikipedia articles I found lack citations, so they probably aren't a good source. They claim that the ROC (Taiwan) claims all of the mainland.

    This reddit thread refers to the ROC constitution and interprets it as:

    In the Act Governing Relations between the People of the Taiwan area and the Mainland area, the following is stated:

    "Taiwan Area" refers to Taiwan, Penghu, Kinmen, Matsu, and any other area under the effective control of the Government.

    "Mainland Area" refers to the territory of the Republic of China outside the Taiwan Area.

    "People of the Taiwan Area" refers to the people who have household registrations in the Taiwan Area.

    "People of the Mainland Area" refers to the people who have household registrations in the Mainland Area.

    The implication is that wherever this law applies, is what the ROC government considers to be "territory of the ROC outside of the Taiwan Area". Currently the application of this law overlaps the entirety of the PRC, minus HK and Macau.


    This the fun part. If you look at the ROC constitution, it makes [...] mention to Mongolia and Tibet.

    I don't know how much of this applies beyond the KMT.

  • I think rules, written or otherwise, should have exceptions to account for extreme circumstances like this, but a lot of online people just go ‘No, if you don’t bring your cart back you’re a BAD PERSON no matter what!’.

    To treat any rule as immutable is an idealist junk perspective. Rules, like all ideas, need to be applied to a context, and I personally don't see the point in codifying every possible exception. Law officials, programmers and others can tell you how Sisyphean that task would be.

    So yes, there are exceptions (obviously!). If you're putting your cart back and you injure your leg, you don't have to crawl on your arms just to put it back. But we can still generally say "people should put their cart back after shopping" and it's clear that we're generalizing.

  • Bowel cancer is now the leading cause of death in people aged 25 to 44 in Australia.

    This is surprising. It wasn't even in the top 5 a couple of years ago, according to the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (gov).

    [edit: another article the day after says it's "the deadliest cancer for Australians aged 25 to 44", which I suspect may have been mistakenly transformed into "leading cause of death"]

    https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports/life-expectancy-deaths/deaths-in-australia/contents/leading-causes-of-death

  • The incident last week is not an isolated provocation, but part of a continued deterioration of security in the waters around us.

    It's in the northern hemisphere about 3000km away at closest. This article is using some underhanded rhetoric here.

    Sandy Cay is unoccupied and is claimed by Vietnam, Taiwan (ROC), China (PRC) and the Philippines. The article says "The incident was well within the Philippines’ exclusive economic zone", neglecting to point out that it's also well within the exclusive economic zones of Vietnam, Taiwan and China. So while factually correct, it's intentionally misleading to say "well within the Philippines' exclusive economic zone" like that, because that's one of many conflicting claims and it's clearly not exclusive in practice.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Territorial_disputes_in_the_South_China_Sea

  • https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wollongong

    Yeah so that's a coastal city south of Sydney, NSW, I don't know much more about it beyond a few quick visits and their university. I had a look at their official website (https://www.wollongong.nsw.gov.au/) and I like that it's got a separate homepage for tourists and residents, so that site will have some useful tips for him.

    Australia has a reputation for the dangerous critters but it's exaggerated a bit. It's not like we have bears or wild dogs (apart from dingos), the venomous animals generally want to run away from us. The exception would be crocodiles, and crocs aren't native to NSW.

    I don't think there's anything too wild about our culture which would trick an internet-connected east coast fella, maybe that a fair bit of our (colonial) culture is closer to the UK than the US, so we might share things like understatement and a drier sense of humour. This page could also be fun to skim: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Australian_English_vocabulary

    I don't know what the situation is in Wollongong, but in Sydney there's plenty of opportunity to explore different cultures. Depending on where you are on your east coast, you might have had similar immigration waves (e.g. initial European colony states, Central/South European WWII immigration, Pacific conflicts and general Pacific regional interests (e.g. gold rushes), Middle Eastern conflicts immigration) so in cities there's plenty of great cuisine from all around Asia, Lebanese/etc. food, Italian and Greek food, and plenty else around. Italians are sometimes credited with fueling a notable coffee culture in our cities. Wikipedia says Wollongong has Macedonians rank unexpectedly high up the demographics chart (~2%).

  • any tips? warnings?

    For your kid? Or for you?

    If you're ok sharing it with us, it would help to know what city/area they're moving from and moving to, or even if it's city vs suburbs vs rural. Even something as simple as "footy" could mean three different types of football depending on what state they're in (and none of them are gridiron).

    If you're not from somewhere with many spiders, might be good for your champ to quickly learn the most common ones here and whether to run from them or keep them around to eat annoying flies. Plenty are harmless to humans.

    And if you're not from somewhere with ocean beaches, learn basics (how to stay afloat, riptides, basic beach safety like swimming between flags) and sun safety ("slip, slop, slap").

  • Though to be fair, Dutton was never going to be a better option.

    Luckily we're not trapped in a two-party dichotomy, Liberal's opinions are slowly mattering less and less and minor candidates are getting more of the pie.