People can choose what to spend their time doing. Some of us choose to be able to install operating systems, other choose to become master gardeners. Who's to say which one is right or wrong? The gardeners probably don't have any issues using WhatsApp, even if there is advertising in it, because it solves the problem they have. Then they go back to the thing they're experts at instead, saying things like "why can't these tech sheeple grow a radish? send them all to jail."
It took me a lot of convincing to get my friends on Signal instead of WhatsApp. I believe WhatsApp was talking about adding advertising or charging money, and I used that to get people to switch.
This reminds me of the argument I see from Linux users that Linux is just as easy to set up as Windows. I think it doesn't occur to people making that argument that most people never even set up Windows. It's just on their computer when they get it.
The setup needs to be fast and easy for people to consider it. Nobody will spend even 5 minutes figuring something out these days.
Edit to add that a bunch of younger people have never had a computer or laptop. They do their computer stuff on a phone or possibly a tablet and they definitely never did anything technical like reinstall the OS.
Unless I missed it multiple times, I'm amazed that Red Dead Redemption 2 isn't on the list at all but something like Mini Motorways is. No offense to Mini Motorways, but RDR2 was a mind-blowing game for me.
Not everyone can work specifically on the one thing you find most pressing. Some people are hairdressers, some people work in a supermarket, some people are learning about genetics, some people are actors.
The platform you're posting on isn't essential for saving the planet, should it still exist? The servers it uses create pollution.
I mostly agree, but I do think that if the website was partly funded by subscriptions or the users paid via advertising/their data then there's a gap for saying it should remain available.
Almost all of that (excluding voicemail) is pure text data, isn't it? There's no way it should be taking up multiple hundreds of megabytes. I can't imagine voicemail audio is particularly high quality, but if you do have a load of messages then I can see it adding up.
My Phone app user data is 277MB.
Google Keep (lots of notes with offline mode) is 10.62MB.
Google Maps' offline maps for my entire local area is only 109MB.
Glad they take stuff like track layout into consideration. A penalty would punish KMAG undeservedly, but a fine punishes the team who failed to warn him. Seems fair.
People can choose what to spend their time doing. Some of us choose to be able to install operating systems, other choose to become master gardeners. Who's to say which one is right or wrong? The gardeners probably don't have any issues using WhatsApp, even if there is advertising in it, because it solves the problem they have. Then they go back to the thing they're experts at instead, saying things like "why can't these tech sheeple grow a radish? send them all to jail."