If you don't post one, all copyrights are reserved by the author and is automatically granted upon publication in most jurisdictions around the world. So every federated instance is violating every copyright.
That is unless it's seen as fair use, in which case it doesn't matter what licensing the author wants to provide because the use is protected.
I wonder if the legacy webhooks implementation in Lemmy has left some artifacts that show up when the services that comprise Lemmy are split up as they are for larger instances.
This is probably the most reasonable take. But I remember getting tipped and not ever bothering to follow the link to try to collect until a few months later when the service hosting the crypto thing went permanently offline and couldn't be collected.
I know exactly how much currency exists and know what the inflation rate is and will be and know that my money is actually safe.
This is misplaced confidence based on core misunderstandings. But I hope you don't suffer for it, but I'm quite certain you will unknowingly. But I also suspect that you're well off enough for it to be of little consequence unless you get absolutely scammed or caught in a legal prosecution.
You can't keep money out of it. You're being subsidized by others unless you are paying for all of the infrastructure that's hosting your data, including when it is federated to multiple instances.
That post seems more academic than practical. I was hoping to see a discussion about what has been shown to work rather than speculation on what could be reasons for some hypothetical things to work.
It's planned to be 100% API compatible with Lemmy, so you’d be able to use any Lemmy-UI with it.
Which is nice for an instance admin, but someone with an account on that instance who uses the default web UI will definitely see a change.
IDK why LW or any other instance would change their default UI.
Because keeping the default Lemmy UI but using the Sublinks backend won't allow for the use of the additional features (like moderation tools) of Sublinks.
let’s just start with their stated goals
The stated goals of who? I'm well aware of the stated goals of Sublinks, but lemmy.world hasn't stated any goals than a desire to have improvements to lemmy, helping the Sublinks development community (they're essentially part of that community) and considering the possibility of using Sublinks if it fits their interests more than Lemmy (which seems likely since they [lemmy.world admins] seem to be more a part of the Sublinks development community than the Lemmy development community)
as a user you probably woudn’t even notice the change.
That's not entirely true. The default UI for Sublinks is being developed to be dramatically different than the default UI for Lemmy. It's unclear if the Lemmy UI will be made available by lemmy.world if they change to Sublinks. Its also unclear if lemmy.world will simply redirect to sublinks.world.
It's also unclear if lemmy.world will use sublinks as sublinks currently doesn't exist in a form that's usable for lemmy.world. And it may turn out that what is built doesn't work as intended and lemmy.world will continue to use lemmy indefinitely.
Linux certainly has the possibility of being cutting edge in the consumer market but isn't and there's disincentive from a social and economic standpoint to make me confident that it will likely never be. Companies like System76 give me a but of hope though. (Although I suspect that they have long-term plans to adopt RedoxOS as their primary OS eventually.
Linux will never be on the cutting edge of consumer technology where you want to exist. But most people don't want to exist on that edge (or can't afford it).
If you want to make Linux work for you, you'd have to accept that you're going to need separate devices (sometimes MacOS, sometimes Windows OS, even iOS or Android OS at times) to work with the newest toys and gadgets. Not even VMs will cut it every time.
People recommending Linux as a primary OS fir home use are a self selected group of people who don't value those new products and exclusive software.
Imagine the perpetrator of the criminal activity in question veiwed the videos on piped.video but sent a youtu.be link to the agents. All of the information collected by the order would have been innocent people whose 4th amendment rights were violated.
Imagine if someone who served time in prison and afterwards got their life on track had their parole deemed violated because they watched some YouTube videos at the wrong time or their location data placed them close to an event that they had no knowledge of or association with.
I was pointing out that the poster was likely referring to Gboard, not that I have knowledge about any data being collected by Gboard or any other keyboard software.
In evaluation of threats, that standard is way too high. The possibility is real even if unlikely. Unlikely things happen daily we just can't predict which ones, because they're each unlikely.
I don't think it would be insane at all. I just think it's unlikely. Big well known companies do wildly illegal stuff all the time, for instance, Meta (Facebook) in the article posted here.
ericjmorey @ ericjmorey @discuss.online Posts 13Comments 195Joined 2 yr. ago
If you don't post one, all copyrights are reserved by the author and is automatically granted upon publication in most jurisdictions around the world. So every federated instance is violating every copyright.
That is unless it's seen as fair use, in which case it doesn't matter what licensing the author wants to provide because the use is protected.