I meant that it copied the premise of FNAF the game that came out in 2014, not the movie from 2023 that the creator of the game insisted on making even after Willy’s Wonderland came out borrowing his entire story including the silent protagonist. Shame that neither movie was very good.
“Autism” seems to be the new accepted term to bastardize into a pejorative, but we haven’t reached the point where the scientific community has to abandon it yet.
I had that film recommended highly to me, but I found it to be a pretty poorly executed copy of Five Night’s at Freddie’s that even Cage couldn’t save it for me.
What I want to know is how Banksy got it back after it was noticed on display in 2005. Did the museum give it back or sell it or just throw it away? Something had to happen in order for Bansky to loan it back to the museum over a decade later.
I learned from Texas public school teachers in the 1990s that Texas is the only state that has the right to secede because of its state constitution, and I’m sure they’re still teaching that bullshit today. Yet they somehow ran out of time to mention TX v. White, but is anyone surprised?
I can’t wait until this dystopia devolves a little further and you’re only afforded the right to ask for one phone call, but the cops can still give you any object in the room and tell you it’s a phone. And be careful because if you take hold of the fake phone, the cops aren’t required to give you a real phone, so you’ll forfeit your phone call, your lawyer, and go straight to solitary confinement.
You’re completely missing the point. Making money doesn’t change the legality. YouTube was threatened by the RIAA before they even started showing ads. Displaying an image from a copyrighted work on an AI platform is not much different technologically than Voyager or even Google Images displaying the same image, and both could also be interpreted as “feeding you unlicensed content from others.”
It’s so hard to tell anymore, but it’s either sarcasm or misinformation because the plaque is still on the statue and a replica of it is displayed in the museum.
Thanks for the reply. If you implemented this rule, would you allow NyTimes articles or other paywalled sources when linked through one of the sites that help bypass paywalls like archive.org?
Judging by their wording, it sounds like they are from somewhere other than the US. What do you expect a foreigner to do that could possibly affect US domestic policy?
In the US, there are constant reminders everywhere. Sometimes even lemmy usernames point out our slight stature.