Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)ER
Posts
4
Comments
707
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • If that were completely true, there would be no syndication at all, but these things come in waves because there are benefits to both sides of the issue. The syndication market was shrinking until recently as companies tried to shore up their IP into the most competitive streaming package, and as that purist model is not proving to be all they hoped it would be, there is a renewed push to syndicate IP to other companies.

  • First of all, neither of those options are a possibility in the above situation. We are indeed stuck in an awful timeline, but this Adidas/Yeezy situation doesn’t add to the awfulness in any way.

    Adidas are not concerned with perceived value of Yeezy, so there would be no point to destroy the inventory. It would only bring them bad press.

    No insurance company is forcing any retail company to destroy inventory unless it is defective. How would purposefully destroying perfectly good inventory be in any way insurable? Just think about how ridiculous that would be for a second. It would be like your car insurance company ordering you to destroy your perfectly good car. It would never happen.