enemenemu @ enemenemu @lemm.ee

Posts

3

Comments

204

Joined

5 mo. ago

Openscale for weight

bundling matrix and email would be cool

It says

Codeberg is a non-profit, community-led effort that provides Git hosting and other services for free and open source projects.

Codeberg?

Caddy does not need 80 and 443. I've changed them to unprivileged ports like 8000 and 8443.

Besides, op doesn't mention having problems with ports

What does it do?

You might be interested in reproducible-builds.org or f-droid.org/en/docs/Reproducible_Builds

At least an ai would've adressed the topic but the post didnt

Unfortunately, the article does not write about how people use it.

I use it to skip reading docs. Either it works, or I read the docs, sometimes in parallel, whatever is faster.

Oftentimes I just forgot how some function is called.

I'm still in the testing phase and in more than 50% of the cases its crap. Halizination is a real problem with those models that I've used.

Difficult. Paperwm/ Niri has the best workflow.

I am looking forward to set niri as compositor on cosmic.

I think it's astonishing that the media believes someone accidentally invites a journalist into a highly classified group.

Visibility :/

I am no dev of rust.

My guess:

• they didn't want to scare anyone.
• They really think that MIT is free and that anyone shall do with it whatever they like. They are not afraid that someone takes the rust code base and produces a proprietary fork and make money from it.

You are allowed to license your code change under gpl, you do not have to use MIT just because the package author uses MIT. You can use GPL.

You can also use MIT or no license at all. it does not force you to use MIT

You could say that, yes.

It makes sense to suggest MIT license for a MIT project

MIT is better than proprietary. MIT does not force you to not make your project free.

It's kind of the default in the docs

https://doc.rust-lang.org/cargo/reference/manifest.html?highlight=License#the-license-and-license-file-fields

SPDX license expressions support AND and OR operators to combine multiple licenses.1

    
  [package]
   # ...
  license = "MIT OR Apache-2.0"

  

Using OR indicates the user may choose either license. Using AND indicates the user must comply with both licenses simultaneously. The WITH operator indicates a license with a special exception. Some examples:

        MIT OR Apache-2.0
    LGPL-2.1-only AND MIT AND BSD-2-Clause
    GPL-2.0-or-later WITH Bison-exception-2.2


  

When I started out (I don't write Rust but other languages), in my first years, I liked gpl and after a couple of years I got to know MIT and I started using that because I thought it is "more free". I wasn't aware of the consequences immediately. Once I read the GNU philosophy and started reading more about free software, I started using gplv3 again

Good for you

Poor prof

Are you still using matlab? Why? Seriously

We as a society have to enlighten ourselves such that we have a standard and this standard is open source.

The more people refuse to use proprietary stuff, and promote open source tools, the more powerful those tools get.

As long as we pay 100 bucks for a shitty game and refuse to donate 1 buck to a foss calendar we are far away from where we'd like to be.

If people would pay good for foss, companies would do it

Mint is not even among the top 10 to choose as a base distro for a government agency or any company.

It's good for the general public