Skip Navigation

Posts
5
Comments
216
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • Isn't the fediverse fragile long-term wise from a structural point of view? I have this feeling that a ton of small lemmy instances will die over the years taking content away (I don't expect this will happen with lemmy.world). Is this something that could happen? Will it be a problem?

  • That's insane, fucking water tap water should be free and drinkable everywhere 🤦🏻‍♂️

  • Inside (2023) has a 63%, but I find it pretty original and way above that mark

  • Will lemmy ever get it's own /place?

  • At least for now, maybe in the future lemmy starts to integrate instance-based plugins (or god know what) that makes more use of up/down votes

  • I feel kinda bad for the front-end sub contractor who just had to complete a checklist of PR friendly tweaks. To be fair, that pop-up box that wasn't written by the same crust of greedy and incredibly toxic executives who have driven the company towards mislabeling food, wasting fresh water and polluting the earth etc

  • That's some incredible stone work right there, how would you go about building it? Maybe one could make a wood arc to serve as a guidance for the shape of the ceiling when you're carving it? I have no idea how to approach the carving and smoothing of a floor so flat with ancient tech 🙃

  • 🤦🏻‍♂️

  • Mhm, yeah, I guess

  • I get that point! But imagine "ancient youtube history videos" like "chocolate rain" were hosted on an old and unstable peertube node. I would find it sad that a decentralized infrastructure erased old and historic eras of the internet. I'm not saying this just defeats the whole fediverse, I just find it a point of concern, I'm sure if it is really a problem the developers and community will find approaches to mitigate it!

    (Btw, I'm not yet well informed about all the caveats/tradeoffs/unwritten rules of lemmy/mastodon/peertube when it comes to data storage, so maybe what I'm saying just doesn't make sense at all, correct me if I'm wrong!!)

  • Oof, that might be a solid roadblock limiting peertube/fediverse. Decentralization sounds great as a greediness deterrence system, but it also feels like lesser nodes will be more prone to stop maintenance over many years, making decentralize content more fragile than centralized. I wonder if a way to counterattack this is via enabling posts mirroring and content transfer among fediverse instances... 🤔

  • I didn't know about this, thanks for the heads up!! But, with this decentralized approach, if a peertube node "dies", could those videos be saved in a different node? I guess one of my biggest concerns with the fediverse is that fragmenting the network might also lead to fragility of content

  • Right, that makes sense!

  • It seems like a lot of linux users are fond of jumping around different distros, do they all automate the setup process with a bash file that installs and configures everything quickly? 🙃

  • In the case of a decentralized youtube, who would be responsible for the data storage?