eestileib @ eestileib @sh.itjust.works

Posts

0

Comments

1,724

Joined

2 yr. ago

Calling out Bob Iger in particular was the cherry on top.

Massive hubris.

Can we please stop giving this insane bloodthirsty man and his sidekicks weapons and intelligence support?

If you think that SCOTUS is not signaling the kinds of cases they want to get (at, say, Federalist Society meetings and speeches), you're not paying attention.

The electors plot and preparation for the J6 coup attempt were also conspiracies.

You're kidding, right?

This is presumably being done in collaboration with the supreme court to give them a test case to permit establishment of the Christian religion in schools.

It wasn't just "pairs of lovers", the Sacred Band was, as the illustration correctly depicts, 150 daddy/babyboy pairs.

The logic was that the top would fight harder to protect the bottom than anything else, and that the bottom would be more ashamed to flee in front of his daddy than anybody else.

What about the one in DC run by Judge Chutkan that's on indefinite hold thanks to the Supreme Court?

What about the one in Georgia that is on indefinite hold thanks to the Georgia Supreme Court?

Those seem pretty hitched to me.

I, uh, have voted in every election I've been eligible to vote in.

I think they already showed us at Uvalde.

Surprising absolutely nobody.

The trials are being sandbagged by republican judges, nobody is actually getting punished for trying to steal the election. They're gonna do it again.

Netanyahu is an OG Trump ally. He is going to try to screw Biden any way he can.

This one goes out to all the people saying "no no it's only contemporary evangelical American Christianity that sucks".

"Poised"

"Seek"

I don't have to read the article to know this is bullshit.

🇪🇪🇪🇪🇪🇪🇪🇪

That's exactly how it works in German.

Gebäude ("built") for building

Gemälde ("painted") for painting

Gedichte ("thing that was said") for poem

They are all going to donate to him and vote for him, what is this bullshit

https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2024/06/rich-top-100-campaign-donors-lean-trump-republican/

... the lion’s share of confirmed contributions from the biggest political givers—the top 100 families—have flowed to Republican candidates and groups.

In the “hard money” category—direct donations to candidates, which federal law caps at modest sums—Republicans took in 27 percent more from the Top 100 families than Democrats did ($85.9 million vs. $67.9 million).

But looking at all federal contributions, including “soft money,” a category that tallies the generous donations allowed to party committees and the unrestricted contributions to SuperPACs, Republicans raked in a whopping $508 million from the Top 100—triple the Democrats’ $169 million take.

I wish your faith in the oligarch class was justified.

"But he says he'd cut my taxes 5% so I'm giving him $100 million in dark money," they continued.