Ech @ ech @lemm.ee

Posts

19

Comments

2,143

Joined

2 yr. ago

What makes you think only non-fascists can win elections?

At no point did he say, “Give him a chance.”

You did.

At the time of that video, over a month ago, trump just got in office.

Second, defining fascism as only illegal acts is outlandishly out of touch. As if any fascist government doesn't make the legal system work in their favor.

And if Stewart is the best you've got, the situation's royally fucked. Get better people to look up to, for real. Anyone tiptoeing around calling out full-throated fascism for what it is isn't who you want telling you what's going on.

"Give him a chance" was a questionable take in 2016. It's downright stupid in 2025. And being pedantic about what people are allowed to call fascist is just aiding and abetting them. Anything a fascist does is fascist. That's all there is to it. While people like you and Jon nitpick over what the meaning really is they've already torn apart the government and are rounding people up.

Stewart lately: https://lemm.ee/post/53889269

It's an ironic line to start with.

The quote in the the title implies its response was accusatory rather than just revealing.

Step 3: Write it down

Step 4: Repeat

Are we? Baby humans are cute af.

Grok can't "reveal" shit because it doesn't know shit. It puts words together, that's it. It doesn't have a brain, let alone a memory of what anyone has changed in it.

"America's allies still don't realize they're not allies anymore."

They can be, but they're not.

Not liking racist ≠ " I love [insert corporation here]". More than one bad thing can exist in the world simultaneously.

It's called negging. They think if you insult someone's effort for you, they'll just try to please you more. And they're so fucked in the head, they fall for it themselves.

It's far from just the one man.

Me when I'm vacationing in the abyss: https://files.catbox.moe/q5fvy1.gif

The technical term was created to promote the misunderstanding that LLMs "think". The "experts" want people to think LLMs are far more advanced than they actually are. You can add as many tokens to your context as you want - every model is still, fundamentally, a text generator. Humanizing it more than that is naive or deceptive, depending on how much money you have riding on the bubble.

Leapfrogged? It never left. LLMs were made to make shit up.

Except it's not libel. It's a one time string of text generated exclusively for him. Literally no one would have known what it said if the guy didn't get the exact thing he wants "deleted" published online for everyone to see. Now it'll be linked to his name forever, but the llm didn't do that.

He'd be failing if it weren't intentional.

A reason to return them, sure, but that's not what the comment says.