ebc @ ebc @lemmy.ca

Posts

0

Comments

184

Joined

2 yr. ago

They already do: Ford has the Mach-E & F-150 Lightning plus a bunch of PHEVs, GM has (had) the Bolt, Stellantis makes a few PHEVs among which one of the the very few cars on the market that can carry 7 passengers on battery power (the Chrysler Pacifica) altough that one is made in Canada, not the US.

Oh, and all of Tesla.

A 100k mile used car is already near the bottom of the depreciation curve, you probably sold it too cheap. Adjusting for inflation, $10k 10 years ago is $13k today. Covid did a number on the auto industry so all car prices skyrocketed, but they're starting to recover: your hypothetical is only 15% higher when you adjust for inflation, which looks about right.

Cheap new cars don't exist anymore because everyone want to buy fucking luxury SUVs or pickup trucks to drive their kids to school. It has nothing to do with EVs; we actually see this trend on the EV market too: GM abandoned their best-selling EV (Chevy Bolt) to instead focus on a bigger SUV (an electric Equinox, IIRC).

I went to Kamelot's show last weekend, if you don't know them definitely check them out. Opening act was Ad Infinitum, I didn't know them but I was blown away! Melissa Bonny is an amazing singer.

Man, you're in a politics community, left and right is like basic knowledge. I'm happy to educate, but did you even google it? If not, do that first and then I'll be happy to help clear stuff up, but please put in at least a little bit of effort.

Modern air combat isn't about dogfights anymore. A plane like the F-35 is an asset in the air because of its sensor suite way more than because of its ability to deploy ordnance. It'll let us patrol our massive airspace much more effectively than the 5-6 operational CF-18s we currently have.

Yes, drones will be important, but for long-range combat they'll get used in conjunction with manned aircraft in the air. The F-35 is a formidable platform for that. Tomorrow's air combat will probably consist of squadrons of autonomous drones under the command of a manned aircraft flying with them in formation.

Just to define the term: Conservative = right of center on the political spectrum.

That "rando" meant that Democrats, which are considered "left" in the US, are actually pretty far towards the right by most other countries' standards. This is due to the Overton window shifting pretty far towards the right in the US in recent years.

Republicans are just even further towards the right.

He didn't say Dems are Republicans, he said they're conservatives. Not the same thing. However, Republicans are conservatives too.

That was my first thought, actually. I've since come to realize that a completely random selection may not properly reflect the will of the population, and some electoral input is desireable.

What you're referring to is the influence of money in politics, and my answer to that would be pretty simple: 100% forbid all advertising in elections. Instead, candidates are provided screen time on public television & radio (CBC / Radio-Canada), a website where they can present their platform, and some form of print media that gets distributed in all homes. They can only advertise through these channels, and nowhere else. If a journalist wants to interview a candidate, they also have to give equal coverage to their opponents.

Basically, money would be useless as a tool for winning elections. Electoral spending is already closely scrutinized here in Canada, this would only bring that even further.

Here's an idea: Every election, you randomly choose ~5-10 people for each seat, and these are your candidates. If you're not selected, you can't run. To make sure people actually want to be elected, let's also make the salary really enticing for the representatives. Maybe, just maybe, let's also make the incumbent one of the candidates, so you can get re-elected if you do a good job and people like you (but I'm really not sure about this part).

I think it'd help make the composition of Parliament mirror more closely that of the general population.

I use famous programmers. First Linux server was Torvalds, first mac was Woz, currently in service I have Kernighan (one of the inventors of C), KJohnson (Katherine Johnson was a programmer for NASA) and Shamir (The S in RSA).

CRA really likes going after the wrong person if somebody isn't paying their taxes; I've had to pay back around 700$ for childcare credits because the provider didn't give me their social security number (I didn't know I should've asked for it) and disappeared without paying their taxes. It's not as much as the guy in this article, but it was money I didn't have at the time, so it really hurt.

By that same logic, can Russia ask Japan to extradite a US citizen because they advocated for LGBTQ+ rights while they were in South Korea? Because that's basically what's happening here, I just swapped the offence and the countries involved.

Dude isn't a US person, wasn't in the US when he committed the alleged crime, and said alleged crime isn't a crime where he allegedly committed it. US law isn't world law.

EVEN IF the guy might've been rapist asshole (allegations were fishy as heck), this extradition proceeding is a gross overreach by the US, and the UK should have laughed it out of court. If a country has any leg to stand on regarding extradition, it's Sweden (I think that's where he was when he committed all the alleged crimes, both the sexual ones and the wikileaks ones).

Just don't be morbidly obese if you're named Leviathan...

shove some text into stdout

That's not what this operator does normally, and if you try to "shove" something into anything else (an int into a variable? a function into an object?) you'll get surprises... Basically it's "special" and nothing else in the language behaves like it. Learning hello world in C++ teaches you absolutely nothing useful about the language, because it doesn't generalize.

C, in contrast, has many instances of complex functions like printf (another commenter mentioned variable arguments), and learning to call a function is something very useful that generalizes well to the rest of the language. You also learn early enough that each different function has its own "user manual" of how to use it, but it's still just a function call.

this std::cout << "hello world" bullshit is in no way intuitive. You're using the bit-shift operator to output stuff to the console? WTF? Why 2 colons? What is cout? And then these guys go on to complain about JS being weird...

No, C is where it's at: printf("hello world"); is just a function call, like all the other things you do in C.

Meanwhile I actually studied computer engineering, but can't legally call myself an engineer (yay Québec).

In most jurisdictions the protected title is "professional engineer", but here it's just "engineer".

We routinely count vehicle odometers in thousands of kilometers, AKA Megameters. I'd say it's a common enough measurement to popularize Megameters

Yeah, but sadly they're looking to replace it with a "universal" pattern too

I disagree. Before I had to copy and edit a huge-ass script (100+ lines) in init.d where 80% of it was concerned with PID files. I just want to start a process on boot, why is it so hard?

Now I can look at the documentation and write a simple unit file myself. It's like 4 lines.

They drive on the left in the Bahamas too, so they mostly import Japanese cars, but there's a lot of American cars and golf carts, so the driver can be any side...