Al Jazeera is like the most neutral of Neutral News Stations.
lol, you are definitely a funny guy or you are hiding your sarcasm very well.
„Since Al Jazeera's founding in 1996, its Islamist skew grew stronger and damaged Qatar’s political relations with its neighboring states of Saudi Arabia and Egypt.[45] According to Hugh Miles writing for the BBC, "Al-Jazeera network remains the standard bearer for the Islamist position."[43]“
For every additional crime he commits and confesses to, his base loves him more. This gag order would be there to protect the lives/livelihood of everyone involved in this case, from trumps base.
You know it is a tragedy really - in 1947 the Palestinians and Israelis were supposed to get 50% of the land each. The Palestinians denied that deal and instead chose to try to kill all Israelis. They lost every war since - and the Israelian offers to the Palestinians got worse with each war the Palestinians lost.
In 2000 the Israelis offered that 50/50 split again - but Arafat walked away from that deal, choosing terror attacks instead.
After that Israel got more and more right wing governments because those promised they would make the terror attacks stop.
This is a totally different story altogether- I did not know this outlet before the current terrorist attacks - the Media Bias Factbook describes them as „mostly factual“ but also worded with a certain intention.
You really enjoy using inciting language like „genocidal conquerors“, huh? You are also purposefully mixing the Israeli government and the civilian population. Are you referring to Hamas as „baby slaughtering and murdering rapists“ on the other hand? By your standards you have to extend this to the whole population of Gaza, too.
You really enjoy using inciting language like „genocidal conquerors“, huh? You are also purposefully mixing the Israeli government and the civilian population. Are you referring to Hamas as „baby slaughtering and murdering rapists“ on the other hand? By your standards you have to extend this to the whole population of Gaza, too.
Edit: I posted my reply to a comment from iyaerP falsely - corrected that.
No. I just leave this here, from German Wikipedia. Translate it yourself.
„Unabhängig von seiner Herkunft oder Nationalität kann jeder Mensch von Rassismus betroffen sein. Das Internationale Übereinkommen zur Beseitigung jeder Form von Rassendiskriminierung unterscheidet nicht zwischen rassistischer und ethnischer Diskriminierung.“
So you are probably new - see - tokenboomer likes to phrase things in a way, that supports Hamas. Take this very Post for example: the Headline says that a certain „adviser calls for torture of Gaza residents“. By phrasing it like that he wants to provoke the response „Israel wants to torture civilians“. In the article you can read that they are talking about Hamas. Torturing Terrorists, even though they are terrorists, is not ok though. There is nothing but talk at the moment.
Of course it is some kind of a trap. Hamas wants as much civilian bloodshed as possible.
Regarding the ratio of kills: if Israel really wanted and they discarded humanity the same way Hamas does, there wouldn’t be a Palestine anymore. They are fighting by different standards than the Hamas Terrorists.
I know you would love it @rah 😘