I'm not the guy to just go deleting settings without knowing exactly what will change. Deleting or changing the wrong thing could break anything. As far as UI, I really couldn't begin to know where to start.
That's a big part of this whole argument at it's base, really. End users don't always know how to make changes in config files, nor should they need to. The ideal browser comes set up and ready to go, without "don't forget to change x, y, and z. Don't forget to download this add-on." Etc.
Why doesnt Mull completely clear out/remove Google Safe Browsing? There's 20 settings still in about:config that still have google domains and URLs. I don't want any part of Google touching my browser.
On a personal gripe, my complaints about Mull (or any FF Android app) are UX/UI related. No custom homepage (important to me), and the alternative "Shortcuts" on the home screen keep adding every site I visit. And while I'm at it, Mull's icon is ugly. It certainly doesnt need to splash screen the ugly logo every time you open it.
Tomorrow morning, Google could decide to program google.com to no longer work with any gecko browser. Firefox will be dead by the afternoon, no matter how many antitrust/monopoly lawsuits get filed.
I'll be the one to stay on topic instead of joining the omgchromebad crowd.
My question/concern would be, why would a browser need to connect to an outside source in order to Forget your browsing? What would it need to reference?
California is supposed to be the bastion of liberal acceptance... How could this happen?
In any case, I can't imagine treating your employees or any human beings this way (if true).
On the other hand, the last paragraph of the article makes it seem like these lawsuits are money grabs from an internationally hated businessman. Last year a plaintiff went from a guaranteed $15 million award, didn't think it was enough and got greedy, and ended up with $3.2m.
You should visit Convention of States website and see how long conservatives have been calling for such a convention. Here's a hint, 34 states are required to pass resolutions calling for the convention. 38 must agree to ratify any amendment.
Prohibition didn't belong in the Constitution to begin with.
The thirteenth amendment had the effect that states could not legalize slavery after it had been abolished by Lincoln. That is a restriction on government. What I said is still accurate.
The Constitution is designed to restrict the federal government from infringing on the rights of the citizens. It is not to be changed every time someone wants a law (good or bad) and can't get it pushed through the right way.
ᴅᴜᴋᴇᴛʜᴏʀɪᴏɴ @ dukethorion @lemmy.world Posts 9Comments 241Joined 2 yr. ago
I'm not the guy to just go deleting settings without knowing exactly what will change. Deleting or changing the wrong thing could break anything. As far as UI, I really couldn't begin to know where to start.
That's a big part of this whole argument at it's base, really. End users don't always know how to make changes in config files, nor should they need to. The ideal browser comes set up and ready to go, without "don't forget to change x, y, and z. Don't forget to download this add-on." Etc.