Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)DU
Posts
7
Comments
969
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • Is it as hard to prove someone intentionally damaged there car as it is to prove someone wasn't raped? If so, then yes, insurance companies are covering for intentional damage.

    A better fit for your example if is the rules change so that insurance companies only paid out if the other driver intentionally rammed into you. If it was an accident all around they don't pay out. How would you enforce such a rule? You couldn't.

    How do you prove sex is consensual when you can't even demonstrate which sex act caused the pregnancy?

  • The court simply didn’t have anything enabling them to delegate their powers in the Chevron case.

    They made up presidential immunity a few days later, then gave themselves control over it.

    The court has a long tradition of deferring to the elected branches on matters of policy. This is based on the principal that voters should have a say. If a rule is reasonable under existing law, then changing it is properly the work of the legislature.

  • Biden won the nomination because he kicked butt in the South so bad everybody else dropped out.

    He always was kind of a weak candidate, but he won, and more importantly he made his win stick during the whole run up to the coup and after. He wasn't in the news much then, but that took a cool head.

  • to adapt language beyond it’s original meaning

    If the executive's rules leading to Loper Bright were not reasonable, the court wouldn't have had a reason to overturn Chevron in order to decide against it.

    Edit: the fact that court first wisely delegated the power to set regulatory rules doesn't change the fact that they unwisely took it back.