Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)DU
Posts
1
Comments
419
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • Wow, you really took out the mental gymnastics to avoid admitting people with more wealth than average should have even more.

    It's okay. Just say you think the disparity in wealth should grow instead of shrink and we can go on with our lives.

    We don't have to be on the same side.

  • No. People who have more wealth than average don't deserve more so long as children go without: food, water, electricity, education, and shelter.

    Instead of lying about what I'm saying, why not try to argue against it? Why do you people keep putting words in my mouth? Oh yeah, because it's easier to argue against than what I'm actually saying.

  • No, most of the people I come across are tribalistic to their core.

    Since neither tribe is saying, in clear and concise terms, "the disparity in wealth should shrink instead of grow," a lot of people lose sight of what's really going on.

    I like to spell it out for them leaving no room for ambiguity. Those who are afraid to answer the question are only like that because they're ashamed of their answer.

  • Okay, man. You need to calm down and think rationally about the situation.

    It really seems like you're arguing with someone else; this idea of the 'absolute liberal' you've cultivated in your mind. I'm not them, and neither are most people.

    How about you get out of that habit? You can't project and then claim 'reverse uno' when it's called out as though you have a point.

    I mean, you can, but nobody will take you seriously.