Skip Navigation

Posts
0
Comments
105
Joined
1 yr. ago

  • Centralization is a weakness. These services can be targeted by governments that want to limit communication. Free speech is a commodity, and servers host this free speech. If a hostile organization, such as a government, targets a channel of free speech such as those hosted on a platform that makes it easy to setup a mastodon instance, this become an easy target that will affect a large portion of users. If you are serious about freedom, you have the freedom to self-host your own platforms.

    Edit: I realize my post doesn't answer the question proposed, but it's more of an argument against such services. I would argue self-hosting doesn't rely on paying third-parties to host your software, but I guess this is in the eye of the hoster.

  • Hopefully we stop relying on these corporate journalist cause "journalism" is bought and sold at this point. Where are the independent journalist? I think we need to start looking towards a platform to fund people who seek the truth, cause every established modern outlet seems to be selling the same shit.

  • Then the menu is a broken webpage with "old" prices and the restaurant tries to charge you more than the menu prices. I thought the point of these were to be easily updated.

  • Our studies show this lower literacy-higher receptivity link is strongest for using AI tools in areas people associate with human traits, like providing emotional support or counselling.

    This is really dangerous, as subjective matters can easily steer people in vulnerable positions to think and act a certain way. Depending on the training data and safe guards put in place, this could easily lead to AIs telling users to do horrible things to themselves or others.

  • When I say residential IP addresses, I mostly mean proxies using residential IPs, which allow scrappers to mask themselves as organic traffic.

    Edit: Your point stands on there are a lot of services without these protections in place, but a lot of services are protective against scrapping.

  • Foreign propaganda bad. Native propaganda good.

    Edit: To add on this, isn't this capitalism? These people are being paid to do a job, shouldn't that be celebrated? /s

  • I mean it's true, in the same sense that in some countries you don't flush the toilet paper as it will cause plumbing issues. It's all about design of the plumbing at that point, and in places where you flush toilet paper it shouldn't be that big of a concern unless they skimped on the plumbing.

    Also as my grandma taught me, there is such a thing as a courtesy flush before ya wipe.

  • a bidet a better investment

    Edit: A sports water bottle can provide a strong stream of water. That's all I going to say

  • Crazy idea: Treat people like people and they'll want to work for you. If you need a consultancy to figure this out, you are the problem.

  • rarted

    Jump
  • I don't see the word "autism" anywhere in this post, besides where you said it.

  • I completely agree. The only deviation from past policies is that the United States did not want to take land, just keep the country under their thumb as to gain the economic advantage without the cost of actually making the country a US territory. The fact the United States has territories that are a long way from being states while they are talking about sovereign countries becoming the "51st state" due to supposed economic value is ridiculous. This is only being said because the incoming leadership is a strongman moron who just wants to appear strong, and stealing is something strongmen do.

  • South America from what? Imperialism is different than taking the land outright. The United States has exploited far more than South America, but they never seized their land (except during the expansionary period in the past, the United States did steal land then but I'm talking modern times past stealing Hawaii, as bad as that was).

    Edit: Replace "America" with "The United States" because saying America exploited South America is a bit confusing.

  • The only way I can think of is require users to authenticate themselves, but this isn't much of a hurdle.

    To get into the details of it, what do you define as an AI bot? Are you worried about scrappers grabbing the contents of you website? What is the activities of an "AI Bot". Are you worried about AI bots registering and using your platform?

    The real answer is not even cloudflare will fully defend you from this. If anything cloudflare is just making sure they get paid for access to your website by AI scappers. As someone who has worked around bot protections (albeit in a different context than web scrapping), it's a game of cat and mouse. If you or some company you hire are not actively working against automated access, you lose as the other side is active.

    Just think of your point that they are using residential IP addresses. How do they get these addresses? They provide addons/extensions for browsers that offer some service (generally free VPNs) in exchange for access to your PC and therefore your internet in the contract you agree to. The same can be used by any addon, and if the addon has permissions to read any website they can scrape those websites using legit users for whatever purposes they want. The recent exposure of the Honey scam highlights this, as it's very easy to get users to install addons by selling users they might save a small amount of money (or make money for other programs). There will be users who are compromised by addons/extensions or even just viruses that will be able to extract the data you are trying to protect.

  • This is a prime example of capitalist brain rot. Capitalists think their money is ethereal and controls the world. Money is a means of conducting trade in a more efficient manner, it can't materialize anything out of nothing. You can't just value Greenland based on how exploitable the land/resources are. The only way you could buy Greenland is if the Danish government agreed to sell it, and this isn't the game of monopoly and the Danish are not looking to sell their territory.

  • Ideally it wouldn't be, but corporations will use whatever video platform is popular to pump out videos designed to increase engagement because to them it's advertising. They will try and sponsor their content on whichever content creator is on said platform with a large audience.