Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)DR
Posts
0
Comments
277
Joined
1 yr. ago

Xenon

Jump
  • Don't listen to the people who say it works by displacing oxygen. It would never be used as a general anesthetic if that was the mechanism of action.

    Xenon has been used as a general anesthetic, but it is more expensive than conventional anesthetics.

    Xenon is a high-affinity glycine-site NMDA receptor antagonist.[155] However, xenon is different from certain other NMDA receptor antagonists in that it is not neurotoxic and it inhibits the neurotoxicity of ketamine and nitrous oxide (N2O), while actually producing neuroprotective effects.[156][157] Unlike ketamine and nitrous oxide, xenon does not stimulate a dopamine efflux in the nucleus accumbens.[158]

    Xenon has a minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) of 72% at age 40, making it 44% more potent than N2O as an anesthetic.[164] Thus, it can be used with oxygen in concentrations that have a lower risk of hypoxia.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xenon

  • Honestly your situation is kind of a worst case scenario.

    At this point Linux works really well if all you want to do is browse the web and play (single player) games.

    It also works pretty well if you're an expert who understands the system in and out and can comfortably edit any config file on their drive to achieve what they want.

    But if you're a Windows power user whose used to being able to set up all kinds of niche functionality its a rough experience when all of your knowledge is now suddenly useless and there's a different set of things that are easy or hard to do.

    Its actually kind of a similar experience going the other way. For example there are some things that Linux users are used to being able to script that can't really be accomplished on Windows except via autohotkey, which from a Linux user's perspective just seems incredibly dumb.

  • I haven't had any problems on Linux Mint with a 3060 Ti aside from some artifacting when I try to do screen recordings (unless I disable flipping).

    EDIT: I've had that GPU for about 2 years. I had a 1050 Ti for about 4 years before that.

    Actually now that I think about it an update did break my graphics at one point, but that might've been partially my fault. I just reverted and reinstalled the same update right after though, and that worked just fine, so it wasn't a huge deal.

    Overall I would say its been more than 10 years since I've had an actual major graphics issue (having to open xorg.conf).

  • Not voting delegitimises the government and puts pressure on the political system.

    And then once enough people aren't voting the government-legitimacy fairy will come down from the sky and wave a wand to fix everything.

    This was famously the case back in the 1780s when most people in the US couldn't vote at all. The US government was illegitimate, and so it instantly ceased to exist, which is why there's actually no problems at all today. Glad we nipped that one in the bud back then.

  • So, keep in mind that single photon sensors have been around for awhile, in the form of avalanche photodiodes and photomultiplier tubes. And avalanche photodiodes are pretty commonly used in LiDAR systems already.

    The ones talked about in the article I linked collect about 50 points per square meter at a horizontal resolution of about 23 cm. Obviously that's way worse than what's presented in the phys.org article, but that's also measuring from 3km away while covering an area of 700 square km per hour (because these systems are used for wide area terrain scanning from airplanes). With the way LiDAR works the system in the phys.org article could be scanning with a very narrow beam to get way more datapoints per square meter.

    Now, this doesn't mean that the system is useless crap or whatever. It could be that the superconducting nanowire sensor they're using lets them measure the arrival time much more precisely than normal LiDAR systems, which would give them much better depth resolution. Or it could be that the sensor has much less noise (false photon detections) than the commonly used avalanche diodes. I didn't read the actual paper, and honestly I don't know enough about LiDAR and photon detectors to really be able to compare those stats.

    But I do know enough to say that the range and single-photon capability of this system aren't really the special parts of it, if it's special at all.

  • I think there's a sort of perfect storm that can happen. Suppose there are two types of YouTube users (I think there are other types too, but for the sake of this discussion we'll just consider these two groups):

    • Type A watches a lot of niche content of which there's not a lot on YouTube. The channels they're subscribed to might only upload once a month to once a year or less.
    • Type B tends to watch one kind of content, of which there's hundreds of hours of it from hundreds of different channels. And they tend to watch a lot of it.

    If a person from group A happens to click on a video that people from group B tend to watch that person's homepage will then be flooded with more of that type of video, blocking out all of the stuff they'd normally be interested in.

    IMO YouTube's algorithm has vacillated wildly over the years in terms of quality. At one point in time if you were a type A user it didn't know what to do with you at all, and your homepage would consist exclusively of live streams with 3 viewers and family guy funny moments compilation #39.

  • At to end of the day it comes down to this:

    Is it cheaper to store steel stock in a warehouse or terrawatt-hours of electricity in a battery farm?

    Is it cheaper to perform maintainance on 2 or 3x the number of smelters or is it cheaper to maintain millions of battery or pumped hydro facilities?

    I'm sure production companies would love it if governments or electrical companies bore the costs of evening out fluctuations in production, just like I'm sure farmers would love it if money got teleported into their bank account for free and they never had to worry about growing seasons. But I'm not sure that's the best situation for society as a whole.

    EDIT: I guess there's a third factor which is transmission. We could build transmission cables between the northern and southern hemispheres. So, is it cheaper to build and maintain enormous HVDC (or even superconducting) cables than it is to do either of the two things above? And how do governments feel about being made so dependent on each other?

    We can do a combination of all three of course, picking and choosing the optimal strategy for each situation, but like I said above I tend to think that one of those strategies will be disproportionately favorable over the others.

  • Specifically they are completely incapable of unifying information into a self consistent model.

    To use an analogy you see a shadow and know its being cast by some object with a definite shape, even if you can't be sure what that shape is. An LLM sees a shadow and its idea of what's casting it is as fuzzy and mutable as the shadow itself.

    Funnily enough old school AI from the 70s, like logic engines, possessed a super-human ability for logical self consistancy. A human can hold contradictory beliefs without realizing it, a logic engine is incapable of self-contradiction once all of the facts in its database have been collated. (This is where the SciFi idea of robots like HAL-9000 and Data from Star Trek come from.) However this perfect reasoning ability left logic engines completely unable to deal with contradictory or ambiguous information, as well as logical paradoxes. They were also severely limited by the fact that practically everything they knew had to be explicitly programmed into them. So if you wanted one to be able to hold a conversion in plain English you would have to enter all kinds of information that we know implicitly, like the fact that water makes things wet or that most, but not all, people have two legs. A basically impossible task.

    With the rise of machine learning and large artificial neural networks we solved the problem of dealing with implicit, ambiguous, and paradoxical information but in the process completely removed the ability to logically reason.

  • That sounds absolutely fine to me.

    Compared to an NVME SSD, which is what I have my OS and software installed on, every spinning disk drive is glacially slow. So it really doesn't make much of a difference if my archive drive is a little bit slower at random R/W than it otherwise would be.

    In fact I wish tape drives weren't so expensive because I'm pretty sure I'd rather have one of those.

    If you need high R/W performance and huge capacity at the same time (like for editing gigantic high resolution videos) you probably want some kind of RAID array.

  • I think just erasing the politics from Disco Elysium to replace it with alps witch is a stupid idea, but there have just been so so so many games where you play as a depressed middle age man. A dude who, plot twist, is destructive to himself and others, and who we try (and sometimes fail) to help become less destructive over the course of the plot.

    Off the top of my head in no particular order:

    • God of War
    • Max Payne
    • Allan Wake
    • BioShock Infinite
    • The Last of Us 1
    • Silent Hill 2
    • Red Dead Redemption

    There's nothing inherently wrong with that type of character or plot of course, there are some kickass games in that list, but I can understand wanting something else at this point.

  • Rule

    Jump
  • I mean, the players can make imperialist characters if they want to, the same as how you can make an asshole character in a DnD campaign.

    I say that its punk because the setting and rules don't depict this as something that's good or neutral. The sourcebooks give a description of how the colonial economy operates, and some of the monstrous things that are done to maintain it.