driving_crooner @ driving_crooner @lemmy.eco.br

Posts

18

Comments

2,294

Joined

2 yr. ago

You look yourself at the mirror: You are Ramirez

Guess the posts times could be crosschecked with times when Musk was in public events or so, not to confirm it is him, but to see if it not

Did 4chan had usernames and so? Wasn't it's deal that ir was anonymous?

Damn. Fooled by my bad arithmetics.

Better this one version

Take your credit car number, multiple by 100, add the 3 numbers on the back on the card, multiple by 1000, add the 4 numbers on expiration date. Post on the comment.

Is the rest of the Salvadorian society ok with this? I know the guy is incredibly popular there, but how is the rest of the government (congress, courts) ok with this?

Hope they're banned forever.

My current job is doing this, but moving workflows from SAS -> Excel to Python.

I saw an exposition of him and is pretty cool seeing him reaching and exploring until finding out that style.

I type in English, Portuguese and Spanish (mainly in English because code, then Portuguese because I live in Brazil) and I use Dvorak. I don't use accents or other special characters, but because I'm a "gringo" I get a pass.

I think we in the financial department need a devops for us, we write a lot of code that generates a lot of important information for strategic decisions and for regulatory bodies. I'm the only one in the accounting team that knows how to code, but the actuarial team? All of them write code. And all of that code is sparced on butch of directories with _v{n}, _final_version, _post-fix, (copy) and so on. Is completely ridiculous that everything is being moved to Python without a git environment.

I'm part of the accounting team in my company, a fucking big corporation, but because I'm not part of the dev or IT department IT dosen't want to give me access to the azure devops they use. So I had to ask for service desk to install git locally and using it like that.

Nintendo never put old games on sale.

If she knew a little more, she could be calling until crash the connection.

In Brazil public employees can't be fired without the government suing the employee and a judge agreeing with them. The right have been attacking this right for years, saying that government workers have no incentive to work, because they can't be fired. The rest of society had argued that this right is fundamental to protect government employees from the political wimps of elected officers. The destruction of the federal government by Trump, proves how important is the workers protection of government employees against unilateral decisions from politicians.

“'Right-to-work' means freedom and choice,” a Boston Globe op-ed explains. “As housing costs rise, some people are choosing to live on the road instead,” a Fox Business headline states. “If your insurance company isn’t doing right by you, you should have another, better choice,” reads Joe Biden’s campaign platform. We’re told repeatedly that “freedom of choice” is essential to a robust economy and human happiness. Economists, executives, politicians, and pundits insist that, the same way consumers shop for TVs, workers can choose their healthcare plan, parents can choose their kids' school, and gig-economy workers can choose their own schedules and benefits.

While this language is superficially appealing, it’s also profoundly deceitful. The notion of “choice” as a gateway to freedom and a sign of societal success isn’t a neutral call for people to exercise some abstract civic power; it’s free-market capitalist ideology manufactured by libertarian and neoliberal think tanks and their mercenary economists and media messaging nodes. Its purpose: to convince people that they have a choice while obscuring the economic factors that ensure they really don’t: People can’t “choose” to keep their employer-provided insurance if they’re fired from their jobs or “choose” to enroll their kids in private school if they can’t afford the tuition.

In this episode, we examine the rise of “choice” rhetoric, how it cravenly appeals to our vanity, and how US media has uncritically adopted the framing--helping the right erode social services while atomizing us all into independent, self-interested collections of “choices.”

We are joined by Jessica Stites, executive editor of In These Times.

https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/traffic.libsyn.com/secure/citationsneeded/CN95_20191205_choice_Stites_v2.mp3?dest-id=542191

I just don't go the meetings, if they actually need me my boss send me a DM asking me to enter, otherwise she just tell me what I need to know. Only when she can't participate on the meetings she ask me to enter and told her if they talked about something relevant for us.

It's also kinda "trusted" in corporations. The one I work for have github blocked for some reason, but any user cam install VS code and extensions by itself.

My wife just learned that the motive the seus chef on her restaurant is going out and back from work is because he's dealing with drug problems. The surprising thing is not the drugs, because they practically standard use in kitchen staff, but that is so bad he can't work while high.

Those mf build their empires on the back of open source.