Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)DR
Posts
7
Comments
396
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • You cut that shit out right now.

    They're reprehensible, obviously. But that doesn't make that not human. That's the same kind of rhetoric that leads to folks believing they could never make bad or evil choices, because "only a monster would make that choice, and I'm not a monster".

    And then you think no choice you make can be that bad, because you're a good person after all. This is precisely the kind of train of thought that the modern-day Republicans have when they take away human rights, and you should never allow yourself to fall into this trap.

  • Well said. This is something I was thinking recently when discussing the matter of Trump's disqualification from being on the ballot with my partner -- on the one hand, it's tempting to think that the Conservative appointees would definitely rule in favor of Trump and that the 14th amendment doesn't apply to him.

    But on the other hand, at the end of the day isn't Trump really just a useful idiot for the real power behind the Republican party? He certainly didn't invent all the "issues" he ran on -- he just co-opted them while (as you say) saying the quiet parts out loud. Now he's getting even more divisive and a lot of people that previously thought he was harmless have seen how insane and dangerous he really is, even before January 6th.

    With all that in mind, I think it's more likely that SCOTUS will wind up ruling that Trump is indeed disqualified under the 14th amendment so they can finally get him out of the way of the more serious candidates that will do what they want.