Dr. Dabbles @ drdabbles @lemmy.world

Posts

1

Comments

543

Joined

2 yr. ago

It doesn't depend on how I define my terms. It was reused. You literally just fucking said it was reused. What you just described is the exact definition of what everyone considers reused. This is such a stupid conversation to have, and only the SpaceX sense are the ones that ever want to have it.

Also, because you don't seem to know anything about anything, what you described is exactly what SpaceX does. How the fuck did you get this so wrong?

Equivalency and idiotic. One of them is a claim about a violent sex act which statistically speaking false claims almost never happened. The other asshole is defending rape allegations.

I understand you guys have a hard time seeing another man in power me questioned, probably because of her daddy issues. The fact of them is his sister stands to gain nothing and stands to lose everything. She is made claims about her abuse of the hands of both of her brothers, and rather than show even the slightest. Bit of curiosity, empathy, or any other human traits, some real pieces of shit have shown up here defending him and claiming she is made these accusations up whole cloth.

That's called rape apologetics, and I'll have no fucking part of it. I didn't say he was guilty, the case hasn't been brought to trial. I've made a judgment of my own and I find that when a woman claims she has been raped from an early age by a family member that tends to stick with the overwhelming cases of incest, child rape, and all other rape on record. It's almost always a family member or someone the family knows, and pieces of shit almost always make excuses for why.

Consider carefully which side of the issue you want to be on.

There's several other examples. I also don't think inventing is an ill-defined term. That's an absurd thing to even say.

We're going to need a duck and some tiny pebbles.

False accusations. The favorite bogeyman of rape apologists.

Literally reused. What are you talking about.

Creating isn't inventing, and there's wasn't the first to be flown. Man, the SpaceX fans don't really know the history of the industry they make these claims about.

I mean, just basic research would answer this for you. But I'll start you off with an easy one. The SRB on shuttle launches was reusable. Now go forth and look up rocket history.

... By pointing out the fact their post isn't evidence? Hmmm. It's funny how so many "tech" fans will instantly dismiss rape allegations made by women, but immediately believe some random loser claiming they were wrongly accused. Almost like there's a systemic problem here.

lmfao. Flat out do not believe you.

They absolutely didn't invent reusable rockets.

So, you say you have no horse in this race. Then why take the side of the alleged abuser? When I have no stake in the claim, I tend to take the victim's claims at face value because the overwhelming historical evidence shows that victims don't make up claims, and overwhelmingly that toxic people tend to dismiss their claims or attack the victim further.

Perhaps consider the subject at hand, and why you might find yourself rejecting the alleged victim's claim. And what kind of person would do such a thing.

I bet you'll be first on the ground defending him if evidence came to light, but I do wonder, what evidence would you find acceptable? What evidence would you consider credible enough for you to accept someone has alleged multiple forms of abuse from an elder sibling during childhood?

My guess is literally nothing.

Is it hard work carrying water for everyone that has allegations against them, or did you pick this one guy in particular for some strange reason?

You could always take one second to look the story up.

Well for sure what he needs is you here defending him. Nice work. All the concern you express is for him, none for her. And it's not "a tweet", it's multiple threads over 2 years. Strange you're trivializing the allegations like that. It's surprising to me when weirdos choose to defend against rape allegations, more so when it's incest and child related. And for some reason there's always the tech fans doing it. Normally I'd wonder why, but I'm sure you have your legitimate reasons to pretend a little girl wasn't raped by an older brother.

Will there be fewer incest rape allegations?

I'm betting the board doesn't think incest rape is good for the brand. Good thing he has heroes like you to defend him, otherwise raping his sister might actually tarnish his image.

... she's talked about it multiple times for two years. Sort of a gross look to pretend a victim hasn't discussed being a victim on multiple occasions. Do you work for his PR group, or are you just a toxic fan?

...from the victim. What a shit thing to say. But I guess hero worship tends to make toxic people look the other way on rape pretty often, so I shouldn't be surprised.