It's very misleading (at best) to cherry-pick a single poll and use it as a heuristic for what would happen if the election was held today. There's a good reason why none of the big election forecasters do this. It's one thing to link individual state polls, and they are worth paying attention to, but if FiveThirtyEight thought they had enough data right now to build an accurate forecast without a huge amount of uncertainty, don't you think they would have done that themselves?
Give me a second, I'm just trying to imagine what it must be like to have so little sense of humor that you not only don't recognize the funny part of the quote, but actually get pissy about it.
I don't think you can sue on other people's behalf, due to a lack of legal standing or whatever. She could probably fund other people's lawsuits, though.
How about we give our own people a comfortable life before worrying about the feelings of fascist Islamist terrorists half way across the world?
Like, did we not just spent the last 20 years "nation building" in Afghanistan to the tune of $2 trillion, including not only military training but also building schools and other civilian infrastructure, only to have them just piss it away and let the Taliban walk back in and impose strict theocratic law upon their society in the span of just a few months. Now Afghani girls aren't even allowed to attend the schools that we built.
Contrary to what white guilt might have one believe, there is plenty of money in the Middle East. Unfortunately it's all in the hands of royals, oligarchs and warlords. There are powerful Houthi's at the top of the chain of command who have a lot more spending money than any of us. We aren't the world police, nor are we Santa Claus. It's not our responsibility to improve their lives, just as they wouldn't ever consider doing anything for us if roles were reversed.
If the Houthis want to attack international trade ships, even after a month of warnings and wrist-slaps, they should expect nothing more than counter-attacks from the nations who are interested in preserving global order. We aren't going to fix them no matter how much money we give them, and so the best we can hope for is that they eventually learn not to fuck with us or our allies.
If Texas has complete control and final authority over their majority portion of the southern border, shouldn't they be the ones are responsible for spending the resources for securing it as well as being accountable for the humanitarian disaster?
The Republicans want it both ways: They want to blame the President and federal government for the situation at the border (but only when it's the Democrats in office and never when they are, of course), and at the exact same time they want to claim total authority over border policy on the state level. On top of that, they love to pull political stunts wrt the border every election year, but when it comes to actually passing an immigration bill, they'll tank it because Trump doesn't want to let Biden have yet another win.
Talk about having your cake and eating it too. Fucking pick one you disingenuous scumbag clowns.
It just shows that the Republicans can't get shit done even when it's shit that they claim they want to do. They are incompetent at best and a blight on our society at worst.
In 2019 during the great march of return [...] During the so-called ceasefire Israel’s war on Gaza never ended.
This would be a more compelling point had you not cited yet another border incursion by Hamas into Israeli territory, wouldn't it?
A lasting ceasefire means that both sides must cease fire, border incursions and other blatant provocations. (It wouldn't hurt to cut down on the militant rhetoric too, but I digress...)
If South Koreans or North Koreans decided tomorrow to march thousands into the Korean DMZ, what do you think the other side would do as a response? Do you suppose that it might rapidly escalate into a very dangerous situation for both sides?
The bottom line is that there was relative peace and stability on October 6th, and then on October 7th, something happened that undeniably made the conflict worse for everyone. There is not an innocent person in the Levant whose life is better post-October 7th, and Hamas are to blame and thus cannot be trusted by any rational mind to preserve future ceasefires.
There is a long history of militant border incursions on Israeli territory going all the way back to the 1948 Arab-Israeli War, and they always backfire when Israel fights back, which is why Gaza's borders are as they are today. Gaza was 3-4x bigger and controlled over half of the Egyptian border before the Arab League very unwisely chose to invade Israel in 1948.
One would think that the Palestinians would figure out by now that militant provocations against Israel are not the path to a better life. They only embolden Netenyahu's government, which has historically thrived on demonizing Hamas. Hamas' Islamist jihad and Netenyahu's right-wing fascism have been mutually fueling the cause of political extremism in the Middle East, and that's why they are in the situation that we see today.
Unfortunately, neither side is run by political leaders who want peace, only power. And so, unless Israeli and Palestinian leadership changes, I feel that we won't see a long-term ceasefire or lasting peace in our lifetimes.
I respect other people's expressions of individuality, romantic preferences and unique sexuality.
I apply broad negative labels on people who don't want all the same things that I want from a partner.
Pick one.
It's possible to support people without being romantically, physically and/or sexually attracted to them. For example, a straight man might not want a lesbian woman for a partner (and, you know, she probably doesn't want him either), but they can still support each other, believe in solidarity, be friends and allies to each other and acknowledge each other's fundamental human rights.
I genuinely don't know if I would be attracted to a trans woman (I'm happy to keep an open mind but I haven't been in a situation where it's come up in my life), but I do believe in trans rights, I love my trans friends, and I want them (and everyone else) to find happiness in their own skin and be able to live as the person they want to be without some asshole politicians in red ties telling them they cannot. I don't think it's hard.
In my opinion that's not a bad thing, it's a good thing.
donuts @ donuts @kbin.social Posts 4Comments 673Joined 2 yr. ago
It's very misleading (at best) to cherry-pick a single poll and use it as a heuristic for what would happen if the election was held today. There's a good reason why none of the big election forecasters do this. It's one thing to link individual state polls, and they are worth paying attention to, but if FiveThirtyEight thought they had enough data right now to build an accurate forecast without a huge amount of uncertainty, don't you think they would have done that themselves?
We aren't even out of the primary yet.