dog @ dog @suppo.fi

Boof

---

Read more

Posts

7

Comments

192

Joined

2 yr. ago

Not downplaying the effort, it still takes time. But not impossible.

How you made it all matters in situations like this.

Depends how it's built.

As I said, it depends on how it's built. And how proprietqry the engine is.

Unity from what I know supports universal code/mesh/texture formats, but if the devs opted for the "easier to use" proprietary systems- well, that's a problem.

Now what I don't know is how easy are scenes to export in Unity. They're probably built with Blender or something else though in most cases, unless Unity has drastically changed.

I mean it's easy to reimplement entire games if you've built it modularly. Just swap your core game logic to run on another library and the game works the same it did before.

Edit: 'course, exceptions exist like if you wrote everything using their proprietary coding language, instead of using something universal.

Edit 2: It MAY still be possible that a translation/compiler exists that'll run as a plugin in a proprietary engine, and converts it into something universal.

The good ol fashioned, <center><div>hecc</div></center> div {display: inline-box; text-align: initial}

Pixel as a phone is good.

Google bad.

But it's not like other brands are any bit more ethical/pro-consumer.

So buying second-hand is always a goos option.

Bingo!

So you were looking for Bad Dragons and Good Dungeons, huh. Just wait, someone will mod it all in.

Probably just no more actually talented people where they were needed. Be it anything from devs to board of directors.

Youtube, as in the entire site, is an advertising platform.

Everything the user does is sold to the highest bidder.

Video ads make pennies compared to everything else.

You can actually just stream media files sequentially via torrents.

It only needs couple* seedboxes by Google to seed the torrents.

Reminds me more of a certain game that was on PS1 I think? This is just in 3D, that game was 2D.

Old plane bullet hells were nice, though. Albeit very hard.

I believe EndeavourOS aims to be as close to pure arch as they can be, while still making it a more user friendly experience.

Garuda is what you'd call "bloat", but for gaming it's useful bloat.

His aim was gaming use, which is why I recommended Garuda for it.

With EndeavourOS you have to tinker a bit more with the OS to get everything compatible with gaming.

Hashing on client side is both more private, and secure. All the user ever submits is a combined hash (auth/pubkey) of their username + password.

If the server has that hash? Check the DB if it requires 2FA, and if the user sent a challenge response. If not, fail the login.

Registering is pretty much the same. User submits hash, server checks DB against it, fail if exists.

Edit: If data is also encrypted properly in the DB, it doesn't even matter if the entire DB is completely public, leaked, or secured on their own servers.

Argon2 is the best (secure) crypto currently.

That said, adoption is slow, Bitwarden only recently implemented it for example.

That said, due to Argon2 being security-oriented, the recommended settings for it are pretty heavy.

Well to be fair, if they're hashing serverside, they were doomed to begin with.

But yeah, there's a lot of ways to DDoS, and so many tools that just make it a 1 button click.

Your password could also just be a long, unique sentence, without any excessive special characters. Maybe even a poem.

Like "Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Vestibulum eu leo eu nibh efficitur viverra. Integer lacinia tortor est, quis aliquet tortor varius sed. Sed dapibus vel turpis at suscipit. Nulla consequat orci in nibh dapibus sodales. Phasellus at arcu ac dolor suscipit pretium. Curabitur sit amet justo sit amet ipsum scelerisque accumsan ac ac nulla. Nullam accumsan lorem sagittis iaculis varius. Nullam convallis nisi ante, id congue diam tincidunt vel. Aliquam sed iaculis mauris. Nam leo nisi, consequat sed sodales non, tempor vel ante. Nunc eleifend vulputate turpis bibendum bibendum. Morbi nec massa in mi sagittis lacinia id ut metus. Maecenas gravida mi vitae lorem laoreet sagittis. "

That's alot of common characters and words; yet, it'll take centuries to crack.

That's a misunderstanding of DDoS. 0 byte packets are actually worse than large packets.

Which is why most DDoS (at least was) is extremely slow 0 byte requests until the server throttles/crashes under the number of requests.

E: Consider this. Are you more likely to throttle a bandwidth of terabytes/petabytes with couple million 1gb requests; or break it entirely by sending >4294967295 0 byte requests that effectively never stop being requested from the server?

Old Steam calling.

Website and Client used different password rules, what worked for the other didn't in the other.