dnick @ dnick @sh.itjust.works

Posts

0

Comments

199

Joined

2 yr. ago

I think you might be on the wrong side of the argument here, as others are pointing out the 'quiet' part of that sentence isn't meant to be low volume, but more along the lines of secret or unspoken, and the 'out loud' part doesn't mean volume, it means 'spoken'.

If it helps, it's like when someone says something they were thinking and goes 'oh no, did i say that out loud?!'.... They're not specifically worried about how loudly they said it, but that they said it audibly at all when they meant to only think it.

Maybe you don't only need vitamins?

Might have to look at that though, it's possible once the funds have been allocated to a department Congress extra less control over how there are used. As long as there's some loophole where the money can be spent on severance, and it doesn't cost more money than was allocated for the year(how can it? It's just paying people for not working)

That's kind of my point though, nothing is every really designed for the food of humanity, we evolved in an environment and adapt or die. It may seem hopeless while we're living through it, and it may be 'different' than the past, but it's always different, from the wheel to agriculture to the printing press to mass production, things are always taken advantage of by those with the means to do so, and we always come out different in the other side, were just living through this one and everyone feels special in the time they're living through. Just imagine the days of the printing press and how powerful those who owned the press would appear.

Sure, but when did that happen? After the first board was replaced? As soon as the first board was damaged?

It seems obvious that the whole thought experiment is just semantics. One of those things that interesting to think about the first time, but after awhile it's just illustrative to point out how we just define things imprecisely and that I'm almost all cases it is far more convenient and practical, but if you look at anything from the right perspective, the lack of precision stands out. Even 'walking out of a room' doesn't have a perfect description if you slow things down far enough, but practically it's pretty useful to describe it as a distinct event.

They were discussing converting the AU to 1 'your mom' as a better frame of reference, but France wouldn't sign on

Right, but things rarely happen 'for the good of humanity', they just happen, and like mass production or the newspaper or even writing and language itself, it appears, we make use of it, we stumble and eventually we figure out where it really fits into the world. It will always be taken advantage of by those with the means to do so, but my point is that there is a period where we truly don't know how to approach it as a society and there is a learning curve and we are in that adolescent or teenage year type curve for the Internet, and probably toddler stage for ai, and we will learn, but we're not there yet.

Further, whether we learn enough quickly enough, or whether those with enough power and foresight will truly steal that opportunity from society remains to be seen. It may seem like it will be obvious right now, while we're in the thick of things, but only history will tell if it's an obvious eventuality or whether it is comical that they think they are smart enough to actually control it. Maybe it contains the seeds of their own undoing.

The issue isn't that musk could have interfered, the issue is that Trump thinks he did and is happy about the possibility that he did.

I still consider us in something like the teenage years as a society, just discovery something big like the Internet and social media and we're going to handle it poorly until we learn to handle it responsibly.

Heads or tails whether we make it to adulthood before the powers that be manage to wrangle things in their favor first. Signs point in a bad direction, but there's no saying that the tools that worked on society before won't break when the next thing comes along. Maybe ai will take a form that liberates, or hits the powerful far more negatively than it hits the masses.

Probably a line in there that defines a pedophile by excluding anyone who registers Republican, or swears to God it's not true

I think the issue still becomes the fact that you hear the metal through it's entire mass and not focused on the ends, so you might end up with problems with the filament where they go into the contraption

Ha, imagine being a troll and having to read 'Lowes' as the takeaway to your post just to come up with something edgy.

No, but it's better than lying by implying a 100% percent conviction rate.

I feel like any law enforcement official that says anything to the effect of 'if you do X, you WILL be prosecuted' is doing a disservice to the entire process.

Exaggerating or oversimplifying just makes your statements fall flat. When what they mean is 'If you do X, and we catch you, and we have enough evidence, and the prosecutor decides it's worth pursuing, and you can't afford a good lawyer, we WILL (probably) try getting you thrown in jail'.

Say something simply like 'We have a x% prosecution rate for this type of crime' and it makes the risk more real instead of 'if you do this you WILL be prosecuted' while everyone who was actually considering doing the thing has either done it a dozen times already, or sees others doing it with apparent impunity.

The'logic' behind it is that if you copy/paste, then the confirmation box is basically useless. If you copied the wrong account of just part of it, your for sure going to paste in the exact same thing without really checking. Not that it's a good reason, but at least there's some logic

Sounds like the initial part of password testing, and then they either forgot to complete it, or someone came along to fix the later parts, commented them out for testing and never got around to fixing/uncommenting. Surprising how often things that 'work' are set aside and no one is in charge of reviewing.

Only option really is to show her how to reset her password. Sounds like she's already doing it, just tell her that's how you log in, you let it autofill, and if it doesn't work you click forgot password and check your email and that's how passwords work now

If you burn it, or fail to use it, someone you briefly thought maybe should go on the list gets to use it

I'm sure the genie will be happy to explain all the intricacies... Maybe when you are approached you can just ask him for a picture or a list of options.