dino @ dino @discuss.tchncs.de

Посты

1

Комментарии

520

Joined

2 yr. ago

Are you tiling everytime from scratch when you reboot? Windows not ending up where they have been last time? How can you call that #tiling? I tried it and its horribly compared to any decent #twm.

I mean if he is the lead dev, then I doubt this makes much sense.

This is obviously what I was referring to, but yeah...

appimages though?

Can you provide more details on why you were forced to reboot so regularly?

Oh then I misunderstood, sorry.

Kind of weird example. When most new software is not even available on debian or heavily outdated due to point release model.

Though, as long as there’s even one sentence of ‘original’ information [...] a piece of writing of that length is worth reading IMO

No. You are just confirming it.

But the book report probably has some useful info...

Has somebody a proper comparison with BTRFS and why somebody who is using BTRFS should look into bcachefs?

In regards to your original quesiton, I would like to know why you stopped using Void linux. Because to me its very similar to Arch in many ways.

Huh? The debian wiki is horrendous compared to Arch. You are better off reading the manuals and trying to get a grip on it yourself.

So many words for so little info. Why are you stealing my time?

This. People don't understand that linux doesn't want to replace your OS. The motivation needs to be intrinsic and therefore there will never be a widespread of linux users because 90% of all people "don't care" about their OS. They want to turn on their computer and use any browser to surf the net or check their emails.

you are not alone, some Bethesda bot not using chatgpt properly.

Alacritty....rust it all

pros:

• very good defaults, btrfs with snapper integration like no other distro (i know of)
• up to date packages
• zypper is amazingly easy to use and understand (zypper dup, upgrades your whole system, one command done)
• if you need GUI tools to configure stuff, YAST

cons:

• worse documentation compared to Arch
• not the fastest packet manager
• a lot of unnecessary packages (not as lightweight)
• solutions for problems are not as widespread on the internet (a bit similar to first con)
• imo weird naming of official repos, also packman being almost required
• https://build.opensuse.org/ is kind of like AUR with automatic QC, but you have to add repos for each package which makes keeping track a hassle

Still if you want to hop around I think you HAVE to try Tumbleweed for an extended period of time, because you will come only to appreciate something like rolling release + seamless integration of snapper once you hit those road bumps. I also think arch is the way, be it in its vanilla form or something like endeavouros. But maybe you should gather some experience beforehand. Btw. I am using Tumbleweed on my personal (gaming) desktop for almost 10 years now. I am at a point where I want to switch, but at the same time feel so comfortable that I am not sure its worth the effort.

what kind of support mate? jesus I hate this argument. As if publisher do anything out of the ordinary to provide linux compatbility. All the work was done by valve already or is still being done.

sway and hyprland are both wayland.

How is hyprland any more "fast, snappy or lightweight" compared to sway...?